[Quiller]

David Brooks: "I remember distinctly an image of -- we were sitting on his couches, and I was looking at his pant leg and his perfectly creased pant,"

- First off, when one 'man' starts writing about checking out another man's leg, I am reminded of Chris Matthews saying Obama gave him a thrill up his leg.

Brooks wrote of Obama, "and I'm thinking, a) he's going to be president and b) he'll be a very good president."

Brooks should have stopped at the first thinking. His second thinking took him from 1.000 to .500. (actually, he's so wrong on that second thinking, I'll deduct points and take him down to .250).

[Scanian]

What’s the deal with Brooks? Is he homosexual?

At the Times, he’d be in the majority if he were.

[skr]

Trouser crease’s are a mark of attention to appearance either by the man, his wife or his servant. Hardly a mark of capability about anything else.

[Haiku Guy]

Our Betters have to think they are better at discerning the truth and evaluating people than We Humble Peons. So while anybody could look at Obama and see an over-rated, doctrinaire, Socialist rabble-rouser, it takes a fine Harvard intellect to decode the meaning of his trouser creases.