Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Delaware Election Results Explained by Democrats Massive Voter Registration Drive
RED STATE ^ | November 22, 2010 | Jonathon Moseley

Posted on 11/22/2010 3:16:55 AM PST by Moseley

Recent voter registration statistics have now largely answered a lively debate within Delaware’s Republican party about the reasons for Republican losses on November 2, 2010.

Mike Castle would likely have lost the 2010 election if chosen as the GOP nominee for U.S. Senate. Meanwhile, Republican candidates for all offices in Delaware faced a fundamentally more hostile electorate in 2010 than ever existed in past years.

Democrats added 29,650 voters — a staggering 11% increase — from 2008 to 2010 in a highly-aggressive voter registration drive by the Democrat Party of Delaware.

Known as “the First State” for ratifying the US Constitution first, Delaware is nevertheless a lightly-populated, mostly agricultural oasis. Only 305,716 votes were cast for US Senate in Delaware. Therefore, the 29,650 increase in Democrat voter registration represents almost 10% of all votes cast for US Senate. It may be assumed that newly-registered voters are likely to vote.

2010 election results for all Delaware offices may be largely explained by the failures of the Delaware and national Republican party to engage in party-building and voter registration, compared to an aggressive and effective party-building operation by Democrats.

Total registered Democrat voters in July 2008 were only 264,167 voters for the entire State of Delaware. Democrats managed to increase total Democrat registered voters by 29,650 — an astonishing 11% increase — to 293,817 Democrat voters registered for the 2010 elections.

Increases in Democrat voter registrations did NOT come (on net) from Republicans switching parties. The Democrat Party aggressively registered new, first-time voters.

During the same period from 2008 to 2010, Republican registered voters increased by 4,153, and “Others” increased by 10,516. Therefore, the Democrats 29,650 voter increase does not represent (on net) Republicans switching to Democrats, but represents entirely new voters who had not previously voted in Delaware elections.

By comparison, Democrats showed a similar successful drive in prior years. Democrats increased registration from 2007 to 2008 by 14,451, while Republican increased registration from 2007 to 2008 by only 1,389, and “Others” increased by 1,286 voters.

Meanwhile, weaknesses in the Republican party’s core operations at the national level were just exposed by a controversial resignation letter by the Political Director of the Republican National Committee. Gentry Collins described an inadequate effort of party-building and fund-raising at the Republican National Committee.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1110/45193.html

Voter registration totals from 2010 are published online at: http://elections.delaware.gov/services/candidate/regtotals.shtml

For 2008 at: http://elections.delaware.gov/services/candidate/more_regtotals.shtml


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Delaware
KEYWORDS: chriscoons; christineodonnell; delaware; electionfraud; senate; votefraud; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 11/22/2010 3:17:01 AM PST by Moseley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Moseley

And therein lies the ultimate nail in Michael Steel’s (career) coffin.

We are being beat at the fundamentals of retail politics.

Hey, establishment GOP stooges - being a leader actually takes hard work!


2 posted on 11/22/2010 3:22:44 AM PST by Yossarian (Heartfelt thanks, Tea Party Patriots! Despite slander and muck, you pulled through!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

The GOP fell asleep and allowed the Democrats to snatch away a seat from them in Delaware.

Can you say Stupid Party?


3 posted on 11/22/2010 3:26:02 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

4 posted on 11/22/2010 3:26:25 AM PST by fightforfreedom2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

And GOP RINO Leadership refused to engage and support COD on the state and national levels.
These facts shows corruption runs deep and wide in the GOP beltway crowd! IMHO


5 posted on 11/22/2010 3:26:52 AM PST by J Edgar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

How many of the 29,650 newly registered Dems were legal citizens?


6 posted on 11/22/2010 3:28:47 AM PST by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thrownatbirth

WOW! Great question!


7 posted on 11/22/2010 3:29:32 AM PST by Moseley (http://www.MeetChristineODonnell.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Thrownatbirth
How many of the 29,650 newly registered Dems were legal citizens?

Delaware and parts of Southern/Central Jersey are filled with Illegals. The article touched on the reason - AGRICULTURE.

8 posted on 11/22/2010 3:34:11 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian
Hey, establishment GOP stooges - being a leader actually takes hard work!

"Establishment GOP" = "Establishment DEM"

They don't care which candidate wins on what for them are "irrelevant" wedge issues.
BOTH parties give BIG BUSINESS the exemptions they want in order to run small businesses out of business!
9 posted on 11/22/2010 3:55:43 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (REPEAL WASHINGTON! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

O’Donnell won the southern two, largely agricultural, counties. She lost the northern, more urbanized north.. There was a precinct in Newark where, in a local office race the Democrat won by 4000 + votes to 100+ votes. That’s right forty to one ;97% to 3 %. Newark is not the inner-city core where that can be excused. It must be U of D students. If the Republicans aren’t examining that precinct for voter fraud, they’re crazy.


10 posted on 11/22/2010 3:59:32 AM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

11 posted on 11/22/2010 4:04:12 AM PST by fightforfreedom2010
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thrownatbirth
How many of the 29,650 newly registered Dems were legal citizens?

For that matter, how many were actual living, breathing humans?

12 posted on 11/22/2010 4:08:38 AM PST by Fresh Wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

“...Democrats’ Massive Voter Registration Drive”

It might very well be that a Democrat voter registration drive involves the registering of illegal residents, cartoon characters, the dead, and figments of the imaginations of Democrat party operatives.

It’s ironic that if anyone complains or questions it, they are immediately and loudly accused of disenfranchising
voters. Yet, military absentee ballots are considered to be tainted by Democrats, or some sort of trivial and inconsequential batch of papers that are without merit.

Absolutely amazing.

IMHO


13 posted on 11/22/2010 4:10:25 AM PST by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

The GOP fell asleep and allowed the Democrats to snatch away a seat from them in Delaware

Maybe the GOP didn’t want to stomp around the grave yards of Delaware looking for voters.


14 posted on 11/22/2010 4:13:08 AM PST by bikerman (Impeachment ! Has a nice ring to it dont you think?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

This still does not explain the 15-20 point lead Coons had over O’Donnell leading up to the election. Unless the polls included newly registered first time voters who were very committed to voting on election day.


15 posted on 11/22/2010 4:15:25 AM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley
Here is a head scratchy for you... a dim leftist won the seat of a sitting Vice President who was the third biggest liberal in the Senate and had held that seat for decades... SHOCK... a dim won that seat... incredible.

LLS

16 posted on 11/22/2010 4:47:10 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Don't get fooled...they did so ON PURPOSE the drive a point....Conservatives are unelectable.

RINOs within this disfuncional party would rather lose a seat then get a conservative elected....I say we return the favor....DO NOT VOTE RINO....

17 posted on 11/22/2010 4:49:04 AM PST by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

The DE GOP is resisting reform efforts. These idiots must go. The state leadership should join the crowd & register as Democrats. The DE GOP needs to be rebuilt from the ground up.


18 posted on 11/22/2010 5:06:37 AM PST by outofstyle (Down All the Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moseley
People registered to vote against COD. Republicans, get your act together.
19 posted on 11/22/2010 5:10:36 AM PST by ari-freedom (Obama is now the Groper in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moseley

Wondering if some districts had 110% turnout, absentee votes that were not valid, and machines with thousands of votes already registered for the dems.


20 posted on 11/22/2010 5:29:51 AM PST by Carley (IT'S THREAT ANALYSIS, NOT RACIAL PROFILING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson