Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/22/2010 6:00:15 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

You know this lionizes Ike, and yes, Ike was one hell of a general, without whose leadership WW2 may have been lost.

However, let’s understand what it takes:

Generals aren’t wusses and they aren’t saints. It was ugly and Ike was ugly in return. Look it up, I won’t put it here.

Ike laid the foundations for our military strength in WWIII (which I consider to be up to when the wall went down in 1989—the Cold War) and put in place the interstate highway system, which is actually a system for moving heavy equipment cross country in wartime.

Ike’s Presidency illustrates why it is NECESSARY to have a military background to function properly as leader of the United States.

For the sake of the future of the United States, requirement for a military background to run for president of the US should never be overlooked. And yes, there should be a loyalty requirement. US interests over all others or get a different job.


2 posted on 11/22/2010 6:16:27 AM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson