.
.
.
.
Thanks again for the pings onyx!
.
.
.
.
Good evening onyx! We love this woman, Sarah Palin...a servant heart....she’s going to be our next President of the United States! I can’t wait! Love you as always, you are a absolutely a force to be reckoned with such as SARAH!!!
Thanks much for the ping. Would’ve missed it, otherwise :)
First, she's not Ronald Regean and won't be because she's a woman who's been attacked, as well as her family. If she didn't go Grizzly I'd have less respect for her. For some, this is 'thin-skinned', to me, it's nothing of the sort.
It's fighting back as any respectable person would, and something Sarah's detractors might want to take heed of: "tread carefully, pinheaded one, lest one lose a limb to a gal at home with grizzlies."
Thankfully, she's still on-board with the freedom message- how individuals free from government intervention will bring great things to their lives, and subsequently, the nation's.
The question about 'being able to beat Obama' hinges on the economy, which, in large measure, spans the next two years (as the first two couldn't suck enough). Funny, I recall R. Regean asking if voters were, "better off now, than they were four years ago?".
People will adjust to about any bad situation. They'll short-sell a house they cannot afford. They'll pay down credit card balances. And, they may even tune into Suzi Orman's show to validate their economizing.
Point is, nothing this President has done has improved their lot; they've done it themselves and yet, this Boy from Kenya plans to take credit for any improvement in the economy that results, hoping it'll put him over the edge in '012. Nothing could be further from the truth, but when did that matter? Expect the media to point this out? Please.
Second, Sarah's message of strength through numbers, ie. free people acting in their self-interests could not come at a better time. Obama's Top-Down bailout approach to problems benefit only those on his 'contributors' list and does nothing but delay the day of reckoning when state's can no longer afford their unionized employees and the pensions they've been promised.
Moscow tried Top-Down economics. They were called Ministries (finance, labor, trade, etc), who allocated funds to sectors of the economy as seen fit by them. Look at Russia now. Sarah's greatest strength is in knowing this won't work, not in America, anyway. The individual as a free participant will improve the economy without help from 'above'. In light of the increasing demands on their productivity, our countrymen still work to produce and will, under any nasty circumstance, find a way to succeed.
To the extent the Fake Hawaiian wishes to take credit for economic recovery between now and 2012, he should be reminded, it'd have been better had he never been elected in the first place. Sarah understands this and would work to empower the individual which, when you think about it, is the unintended consequence of limiting government, ain't it?
How tough is that? Yale tough, Harvard tough? I think not. I bet a mayor from some little town, say Wasilla, could figure it out. And, one has.
She's gut-tough and doesn't mind letting go, those who won't carry the ball toward the goal. The Beltway Boys will be wadded-up should Sarah get the gig. Both Ds and Rs. A new Head Coach? For America? Whaaaa?
I'll let you in on a little secret: we've needed a new headcoach for a long time. So, when shopping for a Republican nominee this term, ask yourself, "could this guy/gal inspire me to win?" How about the other half of America laying flat on their backs?
The Dems nominated (and got elected), their Ball Boy as Headcoach of America. He wipes off the balls before handing them to a referree, then suddenly finds himself President of the United States. What could go wrong? The question is: can we do better? Oh, h*ll yeah. Oh, f**k yeah! You ain't seen nothing, yet!
