Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Balding_Eagle

The website from which the story was reported or the website with the poll asking if they should have an abortion?

The website (LifeNews) is always doing God’s work, but these two hucksters weren’t doing God’s work; they were spitting in the face of people with a big abortion loogie.


32 posted on 11/23/2010 10:54:15 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: rarestia

How?

They brought attention to the abortion debate, in much the same way protestors outside an abortion clinic do.

They made people think about the abortion question on a personal level, just as those who carry posters of aborted babies do.

They made it very ‘in your face’ just as the moving billboards do.

They allowed everyone to ‘go on the record’ just protestors who argue with the pro-life crowd do.

And, if this was a hoax, they brought more attention to the abortion question than any protest, billboard, or even an arrest outside a clinic has doen for a long time.

And they did this all without even endangering the life of one baby.

So, specifically, what is it that they did that was so offensive to saving babies lives?


35 posted on 11/23/2010 12:04:08 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson