Try that reasoning with any other unalienable right of the people and see how it works out for you.
Do you want the states to decide whether or not the people retain the right to free speech or freedom of the press?
Do you want the states to decide if the people retain parental rights or religious liberty”
Do you want the states to decide if the people retain the right to a jury trial, or the right to be secure in their persons and their papers?
Do you want the states to decide if the people retain the right to keep and bear arms?
And, again, let me remind you, the right to life is the supreme right. Without it, the individual person can never any enjoy any other right.
This is really off this topic. I get it. You can say what you like as to not liking Sarah Palin. I can answer you. I have. We disagree, so we will agree to disagree. I believe she is conservative, you don’t.
Your points make sense but the “right to life” is not enumerated in the Bill of Rights. The Court found therefore it is violable by other persons.