“If there wasn’t an attack the night before, we wouldn’t be here arguing it,” said Ives’s biological father Kevan Francis.
The family claims that there were two chances for the state to warn them of the bear danger. The first was when they went through the gate to get to the campground. The second chance was a little more eerie.
“The family passed a Division of Wildlife Resources truck, [that] apparently was the one looking for the bear. They waved at them,”
http://www.heraldextra.com/content/view/260604/
American companies spend millions of dollars on warning labels, printed materials and other safety information to customers at the point of sale.
Some invoices have boxes to check by the employee that the customer received safety instructions. Others even go so far as to have a space for the customer to sign that they have received this information.
Does a duty to warn apply in this case? It looks like that will be decided in court.