Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AmericanVictory

A: I think this whole birther thing is a waste of time
B: Orly Taitz is a foaming lunatic

Show me an example of this “suppression” crap. Do it now.


52 posted on 11/23/2010 4:33:36 PM PST by humblegunner (Pablo is very wily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: humblegunner
Do it now.

What a pantload. LOL

53 posted on 11/23/2010 4:36:36 PM PST by Chunga (The Democratic Party Is A Criminal Enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: humblegunner; Admin Moderator
Show me an example of this “suppression” crap. Do it now.

When I click on the FReeper link for humblegunner it says
"This account has been banned or suspended".

Mr Admin Moderator: are banned people allowed to continue to post at Free Republic? If so what does "banned" mean"?

66 posted on 11/23/2010 4:58:10 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: humblegunner

It is funny how you have a history of getting bent out of shape when someone gives you crap, but the only reason for you to even read this thread or comment on it is to cause trouble or ill will. Go to another thread if you are so threatened by people having a different opinion than yours. Maybe you should stick to pitt bull threads.


106 posted on 11/23/2010 5:56:31 PM PST by freeplancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: humblegunner

Help! I'm being suppressed!!


251 posted on 11/24/2010 1:28:39 PM PST by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: humblegunner

I hope I’m remembering the discussion right and somebody hasn’t already pointed this out, but Doug Hagmann says he’s got witness statements, hand-written notes, etc showing that the top executives of news media and talk radio companies were threatened with annihilation if they reported on very specific aspects of the eligibility issue.

I’ve compiled my own timeline of events that I believe may be related to that and though I’m not confident enough to do a full post on it yet, I believe that threat occurred shortly after Oct 15, 2008.

One of the things I’ve looked at is the behavior of Fox executives. Hannity did an expose of Obama’s past on Oct 5, with Andy Martin as the guest, and by Oct 26th (IIRC) Fox executives were loudly apologizing for having such a PC-incorrect guest, although Hannity himself never agreed with the executives’ apologies. Andy Martin has also sued Hawaii to see Obama’s BC, so there is a connection to that issue. Note that the Fox execs were not apoogizing for the content of the expose but only for allowing Martin to be a guest. They claimed to have qualms about anti-Jew comments Martin had made in the past. But I don’t think Fox execs have apologized for having CAIR people on, and we know what they’re up to...

We also know that Fox execs told their on-air personalities to give Obama a pass after the election.

There are just a bunch of things that I’ve been able to observe that seem to corroborate what Hagmann is saying.

The timeline itself is striking - the timing connections between the ratings for McCain after choosing Palin as running-mate, the electronic run on the bank, Berg’s lawsuit filings and the actions of the judge in that case, actions of Fox executives, Glenn Beck’s move to Fox, Chief Justice Robert’s unprecedented invitation for Obama to meet with SCOTUS (the invitation given on the exact same day that SCOTUS first faced and dismissed an eligibility suit, but knowing that others were around the corner), the date Hagmann says he received the statement of a talk show host about the threats, Fukino’s first announcement, etc

I know this is sort of a tease because I’m not ready to post that timeline yet; have a few things to iron out first. But when a person gets looking at the circumstantial evidence, some things that I’m not ready to be publicly associated with yet actually look much more credible than they did at the time.

There is no question that my content has been censored from various “news” websites, that Hannity’s web page allowed only one thread on the eligibility issue, and that callers to talk shows were screened out if they wanted to talk about the eligibility issue. So at the very least there was a silencing of the issue. But I believe Hagmann’s claims are very, very credible also.

I think Soros ordered the run on the bank when he realized that Sarah Palin could be a game-changer. Then when Berg’s suit was being taken seriously he decided to make whatever threats he had to in order to get his puppet in place. Having already shown his financial muscle he could use it to silence strategic people.

The question has been raised regarding Hillary. She is the person who would undoubtedly have had standing to threaten Obama’s coup. She is beholden to Soros so he may not have had to threaten her, but the SOS position could have been Soros’ idea, to silence her. It is Hillary’s State Department that is having troubles “finding” simple alphabetized passport records for Obama’s mother for over a year now. The guy who oversaw the investigation of the 3-time breach of Obama’s passport is now the Vice President, and the guy whose company disabled the security protocols 3 separate times to allow those breaches is now the National Security Director.

I should check out the timing of the announcement that Hillary would be SOS. And the timing of the Fox executives’ attack on Martin relative to when he went to Hawaii for his lawsuit (and Obama’s sudden trip to HI around then too - followed shortly afterwards by Fukino’s statement...)

Anyway, stuff to think about.


261 posted on 11/24/2010 2:44:02 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson