Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xkaydet65; Errant; HANG THE EXPENSE
"The heat they took in 2000 when their jurisdiction was unchallenged, would likely make SCOTUS gunshy to involve itself when their right to decide is nebulous."

I agree with you ... that if the matter isn't crystal clear the SCOTUS will leave well enough alone, meaning they would defer to the results of the 2008 election and turn down the challenge to BO's eligibility. It would not be the first time that the SCOTUS has acted in this fashion.

But, lest we forget, the SCOTUS is VERY VERY aware of the eligibility issue. Justice Roberts had a private discussion with Obama during the weeks before his inauguration; it has been presumed that questions were asked because the meeting was very much out of precedent.

And, let's not forget Justice Thomas' comments during a Congressional hearing earlier this year. A Puerto Rican congressman joked about his own eligibility to be President, and Justice Thomas smiled back and said, "well, the Supreme Court is certainly evading the question of eligibility."

But there is no doubt that if the SCOTUS ruled that Obama was illegitimate, the nation would have a constitutional crisis like it never had. Forget Nixon's obstruction of justice or Clinton's perjury. For Obama to have run for the office, knowing full well he was ineligible, this is a crime far beyond that of Nixon's or Clinton's. And we could expect riots in the inner cities that would put Watts or the Rodney King riots to shame.

Can't wait.

53 posted on 11/23/2010 10:57:33 PM PST by tom h ("Don't worry, Dems, you've got me!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: tom h

“..the nation would have a constitutional crisis like it never had..”

The nation is bankrupt and the dollar could implode at any time. Get it over with. Maybe the idiots will wake up, shut off the TVs and corn cob ball games and dance shows the drooling idiots. TV empowers Obama - ALL TV including Prince Al Waleed Bin Tal of the House of Saud’s Fox News.

Apuzzo has done a fantastic job and filed the best case of all. This one has slowly and quietly been working it’s way through the courts as Mario has been very careful and methodical.


72 posted on 11/23/2010 11:29:51 PM PST by Frantzie (Imam Ob*m* & Democrats support the VICTORY MOSQUE & TV supports Imam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: tom h

I couldn’t believe it when Thomas said that. Maybe they were waiting for a case presented on more exact terms. Maybe Appuzo is the one who took the right approach. Who knows?


114 posted on 11/24/2010 4:44:12 AM PST by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: tom h
There are two meaning of the word evade. The second one is only found in older or more complete dictionaries.

It's second meaning is:...to be too difficult, puzzling or baffling for, Example: the flavor evades definition.

Thomas is quite the wordsmith. I suspect he was using the second definition.

155 posted on 11/24/2010 8:23:40 AM PST by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson