The argument that we must forcibly advance is both crystal clear and truthful: that the American people *rejected* the Democrat party’s *platform*, their *philosophy*, their *schemes*, and their *conniving*.
The American people are *not* “stupid” or “ill-informed” or “lied to” about what the Democrats did and were trying to do. In fact, the American people saw through the lies and deceit that the Democrats were using, and revolted against the stupidity, the waste, the arrogance, the greed, the lust for control, and the bitter burning hate that the Democrats forced on them.
The American people did not reject Democrat “personalities”, either, though almost inherently, the major Democrat “personalities” reflected their worst qualities. So fixing blame on one or more Democrats, such as Obama, Pelosi, and Reed, is just another excuse to try and protect their ideas.
It was not about *them*. It was about their stupid and arrogant *ideas*. It was about trying to push through socialism, or economic national socialism, while at the same time lying about it, that even though in every particular it was socialist or national socialist, pretending that it didn’t deserve those labels.
And only a fanatic ideologue believes that socialism or economic national socialism works. Yet they cling to these moribund philosophies like they cling to Keynesian-ism, thinking that debts never need to be repaid, and that prosperity comes from overspending and overtaxing.
And underneath it all there are filthy undercurrents of big city machine gangsterism, self-proclaimed pseudo-intellectual hereditary elitism, an utter contempt for constitutionalism, democracy, and republican-democracy, and a sneering hatred of America and American and religious values.
What’s left that anyone could like about their ideas? They are as repugnant as the worship of Moloch or Tloloc. In many cases they are even staggeringly anti-human. They pray for the extinction of billions of people through “natural means”, and failing that, they lust to kill both the elderly and infant, precisely because they cannot defend themselves.
Truthfully, I was shocked and appalled when, during Obama’s candidacy, there was some of the usual stupid banter about him being “the Antichrist”. One of his supporters finally admitted that he thought it would be a good thing if Obama was actually the Antichrist, because it would mean he was powerful, and could force through what his followers wanted. And even more importantly, he could hurt their mutual enemies, smite them, and make them suffer terribly.
Say what? What does it say about a person that they would embrace “ultimate evil”, even theoretically, they are so wrapped up in their own hate, greed and lust? It takes hypothetical evil and makes it very real.
A person like that should not be allowed to vote, because voting is part of the social contract, and if a person renounces the social contract to embrace “ultimate evil”, by about any standard they should lose their membership in society, including the “right” to vote.
This, too, is part of the horrible disease that are the ideas of the Democrat party. We should not let them pretend otherwise, though they would cast their very souls into Hell to force their will on the rest of us.
I also read the American voter and American cultural philosophy in general as being too tolerant of wildly diverse subversive positions, which are too often obviously destructive. We only react to refute or protect against outright destruction when and after being undoubtedly damaged, i.e. the liberal progressives (Wilson, FDR and Nobama), Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, as examples.