Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alaska's Murkowski calls earmark vote 'long on bravado, short on substance'
Miami Herald ^ | Wednesday, 12.01.10 | Erika Bolstad and David Goldstein

Posted on 12/01/2010 5:06:37 AM PST by Skeez

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 12/01/2010 5:06:42 AM PST by Skeez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Skeez

In a sane and constitutional world, states would not send money to the Federal government for redistribution. A state would build its own infrastructure etc. using its own funds.


2 posted on 12/01/2010 5:14:28 AM PST by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

#1 earmark recipient - AK


3 posted on 12/01/2010 5:14:33 AM PST by SueRae (I can see November 2012 from my HOUSE!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

Having lived in Alaska and worked as a Game Biologist in Alaska, and having hunted in Alaska, I can say that hunting accidents are not rare. They do happen. You just never know. I certainly hope Murkowski isn’t a hunter, and if she is, I hope she is very very very careful.


4 posted on 12/01/2010 5:17:59 AM PST by Doc Savage (Stay Thirsty My Friend!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

She would look much better in a burka...


5 posted on 12/01/2010 5:18:47 AM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

This gal has quite a jawline. She always seems to look angry at someone.


6 posted on 12/01/2010 5:25:14 AM PST by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lion Den Dan
Maybe if 98% of the land mass in Alaska wasn't controlled by the feds; possibly could work out that way. It didn't start that way, but sure ended up that way thanks to various Presidents & Federal designations that have locked up the state from any development.

Much more value in our resources than pennies from the feds.

7 posted on 12/01/2010 5:31:09 AM PST by Eska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
She always seems to look angry at someone.

That's because Liberals spend their lives acting angry.

8 posted on 12/01/2010 5:31:27 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

She is who the people of Alaska wanted in the Senate. If they are happy, that is what matters.


9 posted on 12/01/2010 5:36:20 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

“...I hope she is very very very careful...”

Sarc understood, but I hope she is not careful at all.

She is a supreme example of the scum that must be eliminated from public life is we have any hope of returning to a rational, civilized society.


10 posted on 12/01/2010 6:04:45 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

She still doesn’t get it.


11 posted on 12/01/2010 6:08:51 AM PST by Redleg Duke (We didn't limit out, but we nailed a bunch of RATS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eska

“Much more value in our resources than pennies from the feds.”

Develop your resources and Alaska will be a very wealthy state. Get rid of EPA, Interior, BLM, Energy Dept. and other places where the eco-fascist snakes live and Alaska is on its way.


12 posted on 12/01/2010 6:09:14 AM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lion Den Dan
So this is what the American experiment has come to... taking people's money and giving it to the most talented money grubbers, state senators...
13 posted on 12/01/2010 6:09:22 AM PST by dps.inspect (the system is rigged...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lion Den Dan

Alaskans pay no state income tax or sales tax, and in fact the state usually sends out checks to residents, depending on how long they’ve resided in the state, as I understand it. If Alaska has “enormous infrastructure needs” as Murk claims, then it can damn well pay for them itself.


14 posted on 12/01/2010 6:15:05 AM PST by Spartan79 (Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietam servitutem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
She does get it - she still thinks we're idiots, and how can you blame her? The woman gets re-elected by a write-in vote campaign in a state where a plurality of voters are addicted to the government crack pipe.

These senators continue to treat us like children; in this case breezily dismissing our concerns about earmarks because the amounts involved are small relative to the federal budget.

Well, yes: that's entirely true. It is a small amount of money - for the government, that is. And it is a tiny fraction of the budget... but, then again, most bribes are small potatoes compared to what they are truly intended to purchase.

In Congress, senators of both parties are given these little baubles in exchange for their affirmative votes on budget items costing hundreds of billions of dollars to the taxpayers who are adjudged entirely too stupid to make the connection.

Attention, Washington: the last time we brought flags and signs. Next time, it may be torches and pitchforks.

15 posted on 12/01/2010 6:30:13 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

Alaskan need to enact RECALL legislation..


16 posted on 12/01/2010 6:36:47 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eska
Maybe if 98% of the land mass in Alaska wasn't controlled by the feds; possibly could work out that way. It didn't start that way, but sure ended up that way thanks to various Presidents & Federal designations that have locked up the state from any development. Much more value in our resources than pennies from the feds.

I wholly concur. Solution: Get the Feds out of the land and resource business.

17 posted on 12/01/2010 6:37:45 AM PST by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

MERCOWSKI is long of tooth and short of brain.


18 posted on 12/01/2010 6:47:36 AM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeez
the U.S. Senate on Tuesday couldn't quite keep itself from ending the practice altogether.

A totally bogus statement by the Herald, as the Senate rejected the earmarks ban.

19 posted on 12/01/2010 6:58:28 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lion Den Dan
In a sane and constitutional world, states would not send money to the Federal government for redistribution. A state would build its own infrastructure etc. using its own funds.

Guards! GUARDS! Arrest that man! He is speaking treason against the Royal Federal Oligarchy!


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

20 posted on 12/01/2010 7:32:25 AM PST by The Comedian (Government: Saving people from freedom since time immemorial.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson