So, you cant prove that he intended to hurt or kill everyone. You can only prove that he intended to drop the anchor. The rest is supposition.
If he threw a refrigerator off of one deck into a crowd of people, your analogy would work. But, since you cant prove malice or intent, your analogy fails.
Maybe if you didnt spend so much time calling everyone a retard you would be able to think critically. I never suggested what his punishment should be. I think he should be tried and let the evidence sort it out. You have already sentenced him to death because you believe he intended to hurt and kill, not because it has been proven. I sure hope you are not a judge.
I missed the part where this bozo was sentenced to death. Can you point it out to me, please?