Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant
Sorry Pissant, but you just don't know what you are talking about:

John Bolton supports "gay" "marriage", refuses to address the moral questions posed by abortion

“I think [same-sex marriage] is something that in society today, we ought to be able to live with,...”

He also does not support DADT.

As for his weakness on Abortion, all he has said so far is that he is against a Constitutional Amendment against Abortion. There has been no statement on his part that he is Pro-Life, except for the weak: "My position is the same as Reagan’s. As a form of birth control, it’s unacceptable".

Like I said, he is weak on Abortion.
52 posted on 12/01/2010 8:42:54 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: SoConPubbie

No weaker than Palin’s mealy mouthing of these issues.


70 posted on 12/01/2010 9:19:13 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: SoConPubbie
FTR, compare Bolton's position on abortion with Palin's:

Bolton: "On abortion, Bolton invokes Ronald Reagan. “My position is the same as Reagan’s. As a form of birth control, it’s unacceptable,” he says, before launching several legal broadsides against Roe v. Wade—all while scrupulously avoiding the moral question of abortion. “Roe was an illegitimate decision that represents and illegitimate view of the Constitution. That doesn’t mean that people who favor more liberalized abortion shouldn’t be able to struggle politically on the federal and state level. The question that Roe poses is not whether the Court was right or wrong on abortion; it’s whether it was right or wrong as a matter of Constitutional jurisprudence. On that score, Roe was, and is, profoundly wrong.” Sensing a reluctance to wade into the moral component of the abortion debate, I ask Bolton if he considers himself pro-life. “I think that label fits me, and I appreciate that if I go forward, I’ll have to spell out my views in more detail.”

"Q: Why is Roe v. Wade a bad decision?

A: I think it should be a states’ issue not a federal government-mandated, mandating yes or no on such an important issue. I’m, in that sense, a federalist, where I believe that states should have more say in the laws of their lands and individual areas. Now, foundationally, it’s no secret that I’m pro-life that I believe in a culture of life is very important for this country. Personally that’s what I would like to see further embraced by America.

Source: 2008 CBS News presidential interview with Katie Couric Oct 1, 2008 "

92 posted on 12/01/2010 9:54:55 PM PST by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson