Posted on 12/02/2010 8:53:05 AM PST by freedomwarrior998
Here, for reasons that I shall provide in a memorandum to be filed in due course, I am certain that “a reasonable person with knowledge of all the facts would [not] conclude that [my] impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” United States v. Nelson, 718 F.2d 315, 321 (9th Cir. 1983); see also Sao Paulo State of the Federated Republic of Brazil v. Am. Tobacco Co., 535 U.S. 229, 233 (2002) (per curiam). I will be able to rule impartially on this appeal, and I will do so. The motion is therefore DENIED.
In other words she’s a moonstruck, raging Communist, America-hating, decency-hating, Christian-hating, wannabe tyrant.
Grounds for divorce?
IMO most homosexuals are prone to self destructive behavior. They want to ‘marry’ to tear something down to fill the emptiness inside them
but perhaps we’re saying the same thing
Ninth Circuit probably decided that federal judiciary rules do not apply to them.
In a sane world, it would be. It our world, it will not be. Judges rule by fiat.
Very good point and well-said.
If I were defending the law, I would refuse to even show up to court because the outcome has already been decided and then I would appeal.
.
Judge REINHARDT =
Longtime friend of the CLINTONS =
No “Under GOD” in our Pledge of Allegiance
.
For...
the Enemy is now within,
...always has been..?
.
RAMONA RIPSTON HAS A RECORD OF SUPPORTING COMMUNIST PARTY F FRONTS AND CAUSES THAT GOES BACK ABOUT 4 DECADES. A CHECK WILL PROBABLY SHOW THAT SHE SUPPORTED TROTSKYITE SOCIALIST WORKERS PARTY FRONTS, esp. the Political Rights Defense Fund..
Go to www.Keywiki.org, find the search box on the Left side of the Main Page, and enter her name. See if a page on her shows up, or just links to where her name has been mentioned in far-left groups and activities.
I thought she was married to Maoist Henry DiSuvero or did he die?
I’m not surprised he didn’t recuse. It sounds like he should’ve.
Your marriage might be miserable... but, speak for yourself...
If you have to tell a grown man that babies will not magically emerge from his rectum he is insane.
It was, of course, a joke.
Can’t the Yes-on-8 folks appeal this obvious conflict of interest to a higher Court, like the Supremes? Why must the judge in question be the one to recuse himself of his own accord? He obviously has an agenda.
Because it's not possible; not any more than two "female" or "male" plumbing parts can fit together.
I know the old joke you mention here, but it's getting awfully stale.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.