Skip to comments.Senators petition SecState to freeze climate bailout money
Posted on 12/02/2010 9:06:37 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Climate-related appropriations grew from $315 million in fiscal 2009 to $1.3 billion in fiscal 2010.
CLIMATE: GOP senators decry bailout for developing countries
Gabriel Nelson, E&E reporter
Top-ranking Republicans on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee have asked Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to freeze all future requests for climate-related spending, saying that it is inappropriate to transfer money to developing nations while the U.S. economy is struggling.
The letter signed by Sens. James Inhofe of Oklahoma, David Vitter of Louisiana, George Voinovich of Ohio and John Barrasso of Wyoming warns U.S. negotiators not to give away too much during the U.N. climate conference that is under way in Cancun, Mexico.
We simply cannot afford any massive spending programs with such debt owed by Americas future generations, it says.
Climate-related appropriations grew from $315 million in fiscal 2009 to $1.3 billion in fiscal 2010. The Obama administration requested $1.9 billion for fiscal 2011 so it could pay its share of an international fund for adaptation to climate change, which would total $100 billion through 2020.
The adaptation fund was part of the Copenhagen Accord, an agreement that emerged from last years talks in Denmark. Negotiators were trying to pin down more of the details in Cancun, but the biggest development so far has been Japans insistence that it wont work to extend the Kyoto Protocol when the agreement which provides the basis for the climate talks expires in 2012 (ClimateWire, Dec. 2).
Barrasso, the top Republican on the Senate panels oversight subcommittee, compared the agreements to the government-funded rescue of the financial system.
It makes no sense for the United States to now spend billions of taxpayer dollars to fight climate change in other countries, Barrasso said in a statement. Americans are concerned about jobs, the economy, the debt and spending. If the administration is serious about listening to the American people, they will cancel this international climate change bailout.
Full Text of the letter:
December 2, 2010
The Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520
Dear Secretary Clinton:
As the sixteenth Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is set to enter its second week, we remain opposed to the U.S. commitment to full implementation of the Copenhagen Accord, which will transfer billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to developing nations in the name of climate change.
We understand that climate-related appropriations for 2010 totaled $1.3 billion, which is more than triple from 2009 levels at $315 million. The President also requested another sizeable increase of $1.9 billion for Fiscal Year 2011, as the Administration seeks to fund its share of this $100 billion global commitment by 2020. We do not believe that billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars should be transferred to developing countries through unaccountable multilateral or bilateral channels for adaptation, deforestation and other international climate finance programs.
In the November 2nd election, Americans clearly expressed their concerns about record deficit spending. The U.S. Treasury Departments Fiscal Year 2010 year-end report showed that the federal deficit hit $1.29 trillion, topping $1 trillion for the second straight year in a row. These deficits are in addition to our existing debt, which is currently at $13.6 trillion. We simply cannot afford any new massive spending programs with such debt owed by Americas future generations.
Concern about deficits and spending stems in large part from the fact that millions of Americans are struggling to find employment. In October, the unemployment rate in the United States stood at 9.6 percent. As spending dramatically increases, Americans believe there is a connection between Washington profligacy and the ability of employers to create jobs.
In addition, several of the findings of the UNs Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concerning the eventual impacts of climate change in developing countries were found to be exaggerated or simply not true. We understand that reforms of the IPCC process are currently underway and we believe that no American taxpayer dollars should be committed to a global climate fund based on information that is not accurate.
In light of the federal governments dire financial situation and the poor state of the economy, in addition to ongoing reviews at the IPCC, we request that the Administration freeze further spending requests to implement international climate change finance programs. This would include making no additional international commitments to fund such programs.
Its inappropriate to send US funds to other countries while they deny the neediest among us Unemployment Insurance Benefits during a massive recession!
It makes no sense because it is all a scam.
That they have to claim it is bad because of "jobs, the economy, the debt..." etc., is a shame.
But I'm glad they are opposing it.
No one except the bond holders care. When the crap hits the fan we will kick out another multimillion bailout backed up by the full faith and goodwill of a used car salesman with a few warrants and bunch of pissed off hookers and a coke dealer or two on his ass.
Climate change is B.S. and everyone knows it, but the magnitude of power, control and money to be extracted is delectable to the socialists.
This is good! Good on ya, Mr. Barrasso!!!
Short and sweet quotes:
Kyoto is not about climate change. It is the first component of an authentic global governance.
Jacques Chirac, 2000, then President of France
Kyoto is about the economy, about leveling the playing field for big businesses worldwide.
Margot Wallstrom, former EU Environment Minister
Controlling carbon is a bureaucrats dream. If you control carbon, you control life
Dr. Richard Lindzen, MIT climate scientist, March 2007
I love such quotes and attributions as they sure help one remember reality and who is on it's side!!! (or not)
It's sorta like a program with all the players right by their sublime, or ridiculous statements!!!
I figured you’d like those. :-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.