Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paladin1_dcs

Are you sure about that? After all, while the richer Southerners may have owned slaves, the vast majority of Southerners did not own slaves. Those majorities made up the armies that the North eventually crushed when they invaded the South. I’m sorry, but men don’t fight and die for something that doesn’t concern them, and slavery didn’t concern the majority of the South despite the efforts to revise our history. Their fight was over the rights of the States to determine their own future.


Good points. Slavery was not the central issue of the Civil War....it was over the rights of states vs the rule of the Federal Government.

Unlike the North, the South had men of all classes (rich and poor) fighting for their side. The North allowed the wealthy to buy their way out of the draft ($300). This caused riots in the North, as only poor males were being conscripted (America’s nastiest riot ever was the NYC draft riots in 1863)


54 posted on 12/03/2010 7:10:23 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Isolationism and Protectionism sure beat Globalism and Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: UCFRoadWarrior
....it was over the rights of states vs the rule of the Federal Government.

Rights of states to do what?

120 posted on 12/03/2010 10:57:35 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson