Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UCFRoadWarrior
Thanks. After I posted that I saw that I had screwed up the details -- but, as you appear to recognize, the overall point stands.

Lincoln's defenders want the ACW to be 100% about slavery, but that is too simplistic. There were important economic factors, foreign policy factors and also important factors relating to constitutional interpretation.

It was not a simple matter and I would argue that the eventual outcome (a powerful central government, with a greatly diminished role for state governments) was the wrong road to go down.

56 posted on 12/03/2010 7:23:47 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy

Thanks. After I posted that I saw that I had screwed up the details — but, as you appear to recognize, the overall point stands.

Lincoln’s defenders want the ACW to be 100% about slavery, but that is too simplistic. There were important economic factors, foreign policy factors and also important factors relating to constitutional interpretation.

It was not a simple matter and I would argue that the eventual outcome (a powerful central government, with a greatly diminished role for state governments) was the wrong road to go down.


Yes, and all good points.

The worst aspect of the whole Civil War was the expansion of a central Federal Government. The South was 100% correct on this issue....and it was the main issue of the whole war

Few realize that many in the North did not want the war, either. The NYC riots are a perfect example.


60 posted on 12/03/2010 8:55:27 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Isolationism and Protectionism sure beat Globalism and Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson