Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kennedys respond to Palin barbs
boston.com ^ | December 4, 2010 | Michael J. Bailey, Globe Staff

Posted on 12/04/2010 11:13:05 AM PST by ColdOne

Link only.....boston.com is on the list.

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/politicalintelligence/2010/12/kennedys_respon.html?rss_id=Top+Stories

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: freepressforpalin; jfk; kennedy; kennedyclan; kennedys; palin; rfk; sarahpalin; tedkennedy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: ColdOne

These people must have a different constitution than the one signed by the founders.

They see all kinds of things in theirs that I can’t find in my copy.


21 posted on 12/04/2010 11:33:28 AM PST by Iron Munro (This is our culture; fight for it. This is our flag; pick it up. This is our country; take it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The Democratic Party is now a creature of the Left, which means that considerations of truth are set aside in favor of political expediency. Since the day Palin emerged on the national scene, the Dems have tried to portray her religious beliefs as extreme and un-American. They have tried to associate her with Holy Rollers and snake handlers and Aryan Nations-types. And this will not stop as 2012 draws nearer.


22 posted on 12/04/2010 11:35:28 AM PST by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

“Faith runs as a deep current through my family,’’ she writes. “Faith inspired my uncles’ and my father’s dedication to justice.”

Like justice for Mary Jo? How about the justice the Kennedys delivered to Ngo Dinh Diem, the Catholic premier of South Vietnam in whose brutal assassination the Kennedy brothers acquiesced?

Faith runs as a deep current through her family. A little too deep. In fact it runs so deep as to be invisible.

Which is exactly the point Palin was making and which this member of the lucky sperm club of Hyannis Port failed to grasp.


23 posted on 12/04/2010 11:38:28 AM PST by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
"Kennedy's respond to Palin barbs"

The word "barbs" is misleading because it suggests that Palin hade made snide or snarky or crude comments about the Kennedys, and that isn't the case. She simply disagreed with JFK's decision to say that his presidency would be totally disconnected from his values as a religious person. That is not what I would call a "barb." For examples of actual barbs, refer to many of the posts on this thread.
24 posted on 12/04/2010 11:39:50 AM PST by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Kennedys?

Do any have real jobs yet?

Are there any out of jail?


25 posted on 12/04/2010 11:45:06 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

This woman is so full of it: She writes

“No nation on Earth had ever framed in law that faith should be of no interest to government officials.”

Well, no nation except Nazi Germany (which my Grandfather really liked) and Soviet Russia (which Uncle Ted and my dad tried to help at every turn.

Sheesh. This woman is so thick. Debating her would be fun, but not much sport. Anyone with an IQ of 95 would decimate her. Maybe this is why the Gipper had such an easy time throttling her dad back in 1967.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/220949/great-forgotten-debate/paul-kengor


26 posted on 12/04/2010 11:47:21 AM PST by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
As befits a liberal, Kathleen Kennedy Townsend completely twists what Sarah Palin wrote in her book regarding politicians 'embracing' their religion instead of distancing themselves from it. Palin simply states that a politician need not pretend to have no real connection to a religion or, if they profess a religious faith, act as if they are aloof from it's tenets.

Sarah Palin doesn't 'sit in judgment' of anyone's faith, as Townsend states. That is just Townsend's guilt talking. She knows full well that the Kennedy family's adherence to their professed (Catholic) faith was mostly a sham and had no real impact on their political stands, much less, their 'private' life, except when it was convenient. So, Townsend tries to pretend that Sarah Palin postulating that a politician should embrace their faith and not distance their political positions from it somehow equates to 'judging' others religious beliefs. That is nonsense writ large but considering the source and the Kennedy family history e.g. Teddy/JFK philandering, no one should be surprised.

Besides, these days, leftists get a few brownie points for bashing Sarah Palin about anything at all. Truth is distinctly optional, as it always is with liberals. Fortunately, the ersatz Kennedy 'dynasty' has finally, mercifully passed and Kathleen Kennedy Townsend's opinion about Sarah Palin's comments in her best-selling book regarding politicians and religion are mostly irrelevant to the average American.

27 posted on 12/04/2010 11:47:21 AM PST by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
But did she know what a touchdown was?

During the Super Bowl in 2001 -- Maryland Lt. Governor and member of the Kennedy family - Kathleen Kennedy Townsend -- was being interviewed about the game which included her state's team the Baltimore Ravens. She was asked what her favorite play of the game was. She responded, "my favorite part was when the other team scored a football and then we came right back on the next play and scored a football too."

28 posted on 12/04/2010 11:53:48 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Who are the Kennedys?


29 posted on 12/04/2010 12:07:28 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce - Karl Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
Some people need to just go away...And the Kennedy's are one of them.


30 posted on 12/04/2010 12:13:52 PM PST by darkwing104 (Lets get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
Typically, when the Kennedys want attention, one of them politely dies.

Are there any left? If so, what's keeping them?


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

31 posted on 12/04/2010 12:15:08 PM PST by The Comedian (Government: Saving people from freedom since time immemorial.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Notice the source? Only the New England media continues to prop up the irrelevant Kennedy crime syndicate...the rest of America has moved on.


32 posted on 12/04/2010 12:16:37 PM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

ROTFLMAO here in New England...


33 posted on 12/04/2010 12:18:35 PM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

Wow. Thanks for posting that link. Being the Great Communicator began with having great ideas built on a rock-solid foundation.


34 posted on 12/04/2010 12:41:48 PM PST by Hunton Peck (Life, Liberty, Property, and the means to protect them, are what it's about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

ROFLMAO


35 posted on 12/04/2010 1:03:33 PM PST by Gator113 (Sarah Palin can win, and she will win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Awwwww, did the blue-blood Kennedy’s get their little feelings hurt by a little truth?


36 posted on 12/04/2010 1:14:29 PM PST by RowdyFFC (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Well, I can’t be bothered to read the article, but I have almost finished Sarah’s book.

What she says is that in America there is freedom of religion, but that in recent years the liberals have been demonizing religion and demanding that it be removed from politics. Unless, of course, it is brought in for leftist purposes.

She cites JFK’s meeting with the Protestant ministers, when JFK promised that his Catholic faith would have absolutely no effect on his political decisions. None. And as it turns out, he happily kept that promise.

What she says, correctly, is that was a pretty sick thing to do. (My words, not hers.) Kennedy began the popular liberal meme that religion is a private matter—unless, of course, it is used by someone like Martin Luther King who is doing something about which the liberals approve. (And I would note that King has been kind of relegated to the background in recent years, has become a name that is often evoked but never described in much detail. Because he was religious. And because his daughters are pro-life.


37 posted on 12/04/2010 1:18:08 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Instead of seeking to “run away from religion,” Palin asserts, Kennedy should have embraced his Catholicism. And the electorate, she extrapolates, should embrace leaders who interweave their faith into their decision-making.

“Not only does she want people to reveal their beliefs, but she wants to sit in judgment of them if their views don’t match her own. Who anointed her our grand inquisitor?”

It seems to me that Kathleen Kennedy Townsend is reaching quit far to make such an assertion.


38 posted on 12/04/2010 1:48:06 PM PST by definitelynotaliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Lemme guess, they all vomited up their scotch in unison.


39 posted on 12/04/2010 2:13:39 PM PST by 4buttons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne; jessduntno; LibertyRocks; Nepeta; PowerPro; Irish Eyes; jennings2004; trillabodilla; ...
Sarah Palin is wrong about John F. Kennedy, religion and politics

~snip~

Palin contends that Kennedy sought to "run away from religion." The truth is that my uncle knew quite well that what made America so special was its revolutionary assertion of freedom of religion.

Palin's book makes clear just how dangerous her proposed path can be. Not only does she want people to reveal their beliefs, but she wants to sit in judgment of them if their views don't match her own. For instance, she criticizes Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), a Democrat and a faithful Catholic, for "talking the (God) talk but not walking the walk."

Who is Palin to say what God's "walk" is? Who anointed her our grand inquisitor?

(My guess, abortion-loving Pelosi and the Kennedy's don't 'walk with God).

SARAH PALIN'S PING LIST

40 posted on 12/04/2010 3:25:00 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson