Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Graham: GOP 'made some pretty poor choices' for Senate candidates this fall
The Hill ^ | 12/04/10 11:46 AM ET | By Michael O'Brien

Posted on 12/04/2010 4:05:23 PM PST by onyx

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said that Republicans "made some pretty poor choices" in choosing their Senate candidates this fall.

Graham, in a Senate floor speech on Saturday, made an aside comment underscoring the frustration the GOP faced after some Tea Party-aligned nominees fell short in their campaigns.

"The House had a dramatic election. We picked up seats in the Senate," Graham said, video of which is posted by C-SPAN. "Some of us thought, maybe we could pick up two or three more, but we made some pretty poor choices when it came to candidates."

The South Carolina Republican made the comment as an aside to remarks about the consequences facing lawmakers who vote to allow an increase in taxes. Senate Democrats fell short of the necessary votes in a rare Saturday vote that would have allowed taxes go up on top earners.

Still, Republicans bargaining position in those votes and in legislative fights next year might have been strengthened had the party's nominees performed better in Senate races.

Many of the Tea Party favorites who won GOP primaries went onto disappointing finishes in the general election, some in races where Republicans needed to win if they were to have any hope of reclaiming a Senate majority. Those losing candidates included Christine O'Donnell in Delaware, Ken Buck in Colorado, and particularly Sharron Angle in Nevada, where Republicans had hoped to knock off Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

Graham is seen as a possible incumbent who might face a primary from a Tea Party type when he's up for reelection in South Carolina in 2014.



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: frontpage; lindseygraham; mclameslapdog; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: onyx
Graham is seen as a possible incumbent who might face a primary from a Tea Party type when he's up for reelection in South Carolina in 2014.

Graham is toast in 2014. RINOs like him are part of the reason why some of ours didn't win.

21 posted on 12/04/2010 4:27:39 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Well, the worst choice in the last election was Juan McCain

I disagree. Check out the 10 year voting record of Mark Kirk, U.S. Representative from Illinois. He is now Senator elect from Illinois and dares call himself "republican"

22 posted on 12/04/2010 4:28:20 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Go to hell you POS. Why don't you come out of the closet and finally become a Dim.


23 posted on 12/04/2010 4:31:58 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Four more years of this corrupt and clueless bastard.

We have to try limit his unthinkable damage to the next two years until 2012 when TEA Party Senate reinforcements and President Palin are elected.


24 posted on 12/04/2010 4:33:20 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

All that fooling around in Alaska HURT. Murkowski should have been taken to the woodshed immediately following her primary loss.


25 posted on 12/04/2010 4:35:30 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: onyx

When is Graham up?


26 posted on 12/04/2010 4:35:32 PM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Graham is a pos


27 posted on 12/04/2010 4:35:42 PM PST by shadowcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
I can't help but LOL every time I see that 'shop.

Little Pandsey looks to be reliving Shirley MacLaine's bedpost scene in Being There.

28 posted on 12/04/2010 4:37:02 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I’m looking forward to having Graham cracker crumbs with my tea in 2014.


29 posted on 12/04/2010 4:38:12 PM PST by WorkingClassFilth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88; RedMDer; upchuck

South Carolina *has* to find a good conservative to unseat him.


30 posted on 12/04/2010 4:38:28 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Hopefully SC Repubs wake up in 2014.


31 posted on 12/04/2010 4:39:34 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Maybe Representative Joe Wilson of “You lie” fame will challenge Lindsey in 2014.


32 posted on 12/04/2010 4:41:49 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan

2014


33 posted on 12/04/2010 4:42:11 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Will88
Maybe Representative Joe Wilson of “You lie” fame will challenge Lindsey in 2014.

I haven't followed his voting record, but he's a good thought!

34 posted on 12/04/2010 4:44:28 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I predict Graham will continue to drift left (although he never was a conservative) until 2012. Then he’ll “see the light” and at least talk like a conservative until he is trounced in the primaries.


35 posted on 12/04/2010 4:46:38 PM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

LOL.


36 posted on 12/04/2010 4:48:03 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Someone tell the Cotillion Lady-boy that he's the problem and not the solution. The girl is plumb loco.
37 posted on 12/04/2010 4:48:44 PM PST by VRWC For Truth (Throw the bums out who vote yes on the bailout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx
He must have a morbid fear that a "poor choice" will rise up and kick his sorry Hillary smooching tail out of office in 2014. Perhaps the Tea Party should change its name to "The Poor Choice Party" to scare the pants off the remaining rinos, but I suspect they are quivering in their boots enough already.

Provided the TP keeps working, organizing, holding rallies and meetings to maintain the enthusiasm we have a very good chance to correct the left listing course of our ship of state. Its true that the nature of this sort of taxpayer revolt may have some unvetted not-ready-for-primetime folks but luckily there is no rule which demands a 100% success rate in every election.

38 posted on 12/04/2010 4:49:26 PM PST by 1-Eagle (B.Franklin: "A Republic...if you can keep it." Let us all resolve to be Keepers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1-Eagle
He knows he's going to be TEA Party'd. He's said so, and that's why I think he rarely misses a chance to take a whack at us.
39 posted on 12/04/2010 4:52:26 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Republican hierarchy made major mistakes by not fully supporting every Republican nominee, and they should be constantly reminded of their failure!!
40 posted on 12/04/2010 4:59:19 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson