Why did Kristin Murray falsely claim she “RAN” Christine O’Donnell’s 2008 Senate election campaign?

RED STATE ^ | December 5, 2010 | GrassRoots1773

[GrassRoots1773]

Telling lies fraudulently attacking Christine O’Donnell established a new low in American politics in 2010. Each lie grew more preposterous than the last.

But part of that low in American politics was dredged by KRISTIN MURRAY – the former Executive Director of the Delaware Republican State Committee.

In 2008, Christine O’Donnell was asked by leaders of the Republican Party of Delaware to run for the United States Senate against long-term Senate veteran Joe Biden.

O’Donnell was the official nominee of the Republican Party in Delaware. Republicans thought Christine O’Donnell was great in 2008.

Christine O’Donnell was on the November ballot alongside Republican Presidential nominee John McCain and candidate for Delaware Governor Judge Lee.

Christine O”Donnell was perfectly acceptable to run alongside the Presidential and Gubernatorial nominees of the Republican Party. It was not until a small circle around Mike Castle and Tom Ross decided “our way or the highway” all hell broke loose.

For about 1 1/2 weeks, Kristin Murray became the campaign manager for Christine O’Donnell in the Summer of 2008. (Christine O’Donnell’s successful, earlier 2008 nomination contest at the May 2008 convention had been run by Jon Moseley.)

Kristin Murray worked for about 1 week, then had personal issues taking her away from work, and then came back to about 1 more meeting.

After 1 1/2 weeks ( 1 week + 2 days spread over a 3 week period), Kristin Murray was FIRED for not showing up to work.

Christine O’Donnell had to FIRE Kristin Murray as campaign manager after only 1 1/2 to 2 weeks on the job because Kristin Murray was not doing the job, and was completely distracted, unfocused, and inattentive to the work.

Obviously bitter, Kristin Murray has maintained a vendetta against Christine O’Donnell.

However, Kristin Murray fraudulently portrays herself as the person who “ran” Christine O’Donnell’s 2008 campaign for US Senate.

Although Christine O’Donnell has been fighting for conservative causes since 1993, often as a volunteer, Kristin Murray claimed that Christine O’Donnell was not a conservative… and similarly absurd claims.

MOST SIGNIFICANTLY, Kristin Murray’s 1 1/2 weeks means she COULD NOT KNOW what she claims in her attacks on Christine O’Donnell.

Kristin Murray now attacks Christine O’Donnell about matters that Murray could not possibly have any knowledge about during her 1 1/2 weeks of inattentive presence — distracted by other, outside personal concerns and personal relationships then consuming her attention.

Kristin Murray is not only lying about being the one who “RAN” Christine O”Donnell’s 2008 US Senate campaign, but is lying about every other criticism of Christine O’Donnell. Most of all, Kristin Murray is lying about actually knowing anything about Christine O’Donnell — other than repeating the lies of others.

Now, remember:

KRISTIN MURRAY was the former Executive Director of the Delaware Republican State Committee .

And Tom Ross, the current Chairman of the Delaware Republican Party paid for an automated recorded telephone call to all Republican voters of Kristin Murray lying and claiming to have “RUN” Christine O’Donnell’s 2008 Senate campaign and spreading other lies.

Tom Ross fraudulently misrepresented Kristin Murray as having “RUN” Christine Murray’s 2008 US Senate campaign….

[Moseley]

Since Gondring has made it his project to spread lies about Christine O’Donnell, Please show me these supposed lies.

Been there, done that, got the T-shirt. Mission accomplished. You, sir, are a liar, and you have been proven lying about Christine O'Donnell.

It is one thing to be mistaken. But to keep repeating lies after you have been shown the truth, that is a completely different matter.

[Moseley]

but even a bad lawyer should know that false defamation is not a light matter.

Yes, I have a defamation lawsuit going to court on December 8. Woudl you like me to add you, too?

Unfortunately, Christine O'Donnell is a "public figure" and another person would not have standing to sue on her behalf. Otherwise, I could make a fortune suing about all the lies told against her.

[Moseley]

Gondring makes us laugh by saying that we should support a “conservative” who does not realize that the “separation of church and state” is NOT in the US Constitution.

This is one more example of Gondring lying. We went through this over and over and over.

Christine is correct. Her critics are clueless.

Gondring, WHY didn’t anyone collect the $1,000 reward?

http://www.supportchristine.com/rewardpressrelease.html

Christine O’Donnell was correct on the Constitution.

But what “conservative” does Gondring think would AGREE with things *NOT* in the US Constitution are in the US Constitution? If that is what Gondring thinks as a “conservative” we area all having a good laugh.

[Moseley]

BTW, did you have a copy of Miss O'Donnell's résumé from back when she was suing conservatives, claiming fraud? Did she happen to fraudulently claim a college degree? Are you going to suggest to ISI that they file a lawsuit against Miss O'Donnell?

There are people at ISI who belong in jail for their conduct regarding Christine O'Donnell. And you can go tell them that. Let them sue me. I dare them.

Christine never at any time misrepresented her qualifications, education, or anything else. And I reviewed the facts to make sure of it at the time.

[Fundamentally Fair]

Banned already? I guess poor writing has its consequences.

[sauropod]

popcorn

[Gondring]

Gondring makes us laugh by saying that we should support a “conservative” who does not realize that the “separation of church and state” is NOT in the US Constitution.

Point out where I said what you claimed.

You can't, because you made it up and hope that readers don't catch it.

Now, let's look at an actual response from Christine O'Donnell.

Chris Coons> "'Government shall make no establishment of religion.'"

Christine O'Donnell> "That's in the First Amendment?"

--October 19, 2010

I suppose next you'll tell me that Mike Castle snuck in and stole her copy of the Constitution so she couldn't look up what the 14th and 16th Amendments are (also in the debate).

• What true conservative would run for the seat of Senator and not know the Constitutional amendments?
• What true conservative running for a position that passes legislation would not take the effort to learn the Constitution?
• What true conservative running for a one in one-in-three-million position wouldn't know what amendment is the key to the direct taxation from the federal government?!

None. She's not a conservative.

This is one more example of Gondring lying. We went through this over and over and over.

B.S.

If we had, then the evidence wouldn't be sitting so plainly there to support my position, where everyone can go look themselves.

Christine is correct. Her critics are clueless.

Correct in what...questioning whether "'Government shall make no establishment of religion.'" is in the First Amendment? Well, those literal words aren't, but it does say, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion [...]"

Are you claiming that Christine O'Donnell's big GOTCHA! is a couple of missing words that are of minor relevance to the question asked?

Gondring, WHY didn’t anyone collect the $1,000 reward?

Because it's one of your straw men.

Reader--take note how he tries to cover her goof by pretending people were criticizing her for something else. You can't find the phrase "pickled vase tendrils" in the Bill of Rights, but even if I offered a reward, that action would be meannigless.

Christine O’Donnell was correct on the Constitution.

She admitted she didn't know it. So I guess she was right on that.

But what “conservative” does Gondring think would AGREE with things *NOT* in the US Constitution are in the US Constitution?

Correct your syntax so the sentence is grammatical and maybe I could answer it.

If that is what Gondring thinks as a “conservative” we area all having a good laugh.

Laugh about it; shout about it! I'm glad things are looking up for you. Are you still skipping meds, though? Better check in with the doc.

[Moseley]

GONDRING,

‘GOVERNMENT SHALL MAKE NO ESTABLISHMENNT OF RELIGION

is not in the constitution.

that is not what the first amendment says.

[Gondring]

GONDRING,

‘GOVERNMENT SHALL MAKE NO ESTABLISHMENNT OF RELIGION

is not in the constitution.

that is not what the first amendment says.

And as I wrote before:

Correct in what...questioning whether "'Government shall make no establishment of religion.'" is in the First Amendment? Well, those literal words aren't, but it does say, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion [...]"

Are you claiming that Christine O'Donnell's big GOTCHA! is a couple of missing words that are of minor relevance to the question asked?

Yet you claimed I had said something about church and state...and I had not. Nice try at distraction, but remember that the topic is your misrepresentation of me. Your dishonesty has been revealed and you scurry away and bite on the other ankle.

But in any case, remember that Miss O'Donnell herself admitted that she didn't know the Constutution.

[Moseley]

Christine O’Donnell... CORRECT, Game, set, match... tournament to Christine O’Donnell.

You are ignoring the fact that your boy Chris Coons offered THREE DIFFERENT VERSIONS of the First Amendment and the final version WAS STILL NOT RIGHT.

NONE of Chris Coons versions of the First Amendment were correct.

Coons started out saying it said there is a separation of church and state. He was backpedaling from that and STILL go the Constitution wrong.

Coons refused to name the 5 freedoms protected by the First Amendment, which Christine correctly knew.

Coons accused Chritine of believing that the Constitution limits the powers of Congress. Coons claimed that the powers of Congress are NOT limited by what the Constitution says.

Christine O’Donnell knows the US Constitution backward and forward.

Coons and you do not.

[Gondring]

I campaigned against Chris Coons. I suspect you were one of the ones who helped him get into a Senate seat.

[Gondring]

Christine O’Donnell knows the US Constitution backward and forward.

If true, then why did she lie during the debate and say differently.

Sorry, but your credibility is even worse than hers. I'll believe her on this one.

[Moseley]

Christine O’Donnell knows the US Constitution backward and forward. If true, then why did she lie during the debate and say differently.

She did not. Question answered.

Christine O'Donnell got the Constitution 100% correct.

Chris Coons got it completely wrong.

[Moseley]

GONDRING WROTE: I campaigned against Chris Coons. I suspect you were one of the ones who helped him get into a Senate seat.

Gondring, you are such a liar. You were posting on here from around mid-September attacking Christine O'Donnell with outrageous lies. You wer helping to spread the Kristin Murray / Tom Ross slander including right here on Free Republic as early as mid-September.

You are one of the main reasons for the media firestorm of slander against Christine O'Donnell.

You elected Chris Coons

[Gondring]

Okay, so she intentionally looked like an idiot. She asked and claimed she didn’t know what the Sixteenth Amendment is, even though she knew it.

Oooh...tricky!

Was that dingbat routine meant to throw the opponent off guard, making him too confident? The rest of the world took it at face value—that she shoots her mouth off about things and then when asked about details, she doesn’t know what she’s talking about.

“Fortunately, senators don’t have to memorize the Constitution. Can you remind me of what the other [Amendments] are?” —Christine O’Donnell

[Moseley]

Christine did know the 16th Amendment, just not memorized by number.

First, Christine instantly recognized the 17th Amendment and discussed it in detail.

You would not know the 17th amendment off the top of your head, if you had not been reminded of it in this debate.

Christine then asked to be reminded of which debate the numbers went with.

She was given a 1 word reminder of which amendments those were by number.

With a 1 word reminder, she then launched into a detailed analysis and discussion of those other amendments from memory without any more than a 1 word reminder.

[Gondring]

Christine did know the 16th Amendment, just not memorized by number.

O RLY?!

Yeah, right. Let's review what she has to say about the 16th Amendment:

"[the sixteenth amendment] gives Congress the power to tax."

Now let's look at the Constitution (not the sixteenth amendment) as it was:

"The Congress shall have power To lay and collect Taxes,[...]"

Ol' Grifter Girl evidently wasn't aware that Congressionally instituted taxes--even income taxes--had been around before the sixteenth. Even Pollock didn't take that away from Congress.

But I'm not a lawyer. Perhaps you know one who can explain how she somehow meant something other than what she said. Maybe that lawyer can teach you what the sixteenth really did.

The rest of us realize she's a dishonest loon with a veil of pseudoconservatism that gets broken every so often when scrutiny gets close.

[allmendream]

Wow, if she were paying him for his “services” on her behalf, she is less competent than the worst reports suggest!

[Moseley]

Gondring, isn't it funny you spend so much time attacking conservatives, but never liberals.

Where do you get your lies?

Here is the exchange at the Widener debate:

http://www.supportchristine.com/reward

Christine made no comment like what you suggest about the 16th amendment.

THE QUESTIONER described the 16th Amendment as giving power of Congress as "THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX"

Christine made no such statement as you lie and claim here.

Gondring, what should all people looking at you learn from the fact that you spend so much energy attacking conservatives and NONE attacking liberals?

[Moseley]

Again you claim that Christine O'Donnell said:

Yeah, right. Let's review what she has to say about the 16th Amendment: "[the sixteenth amendment] gives Congress the power to tax."

CHRISTINE SAID NO SUCH THING, as the video shows:

http://www.supportchristine.com/reward