Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Salman; The_Repugnant_Conservative

If you don’t see the difference between classical nude sculptures and paintings, and the offensive in the extreme faggot blasphemy, you either didn’t read the article, or the homosexual agenda doesn’t bother you. Why would it not bother someone, is the next question.


30 posted on 12/09/2010 10:38:13 AM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

Did you see what the Fagot Blasphemy was?

The exhibit is not exactly the Folsom Street Fair of sexual perversions. At least not the pictures and Photo’s that the Smithsonian has placed online. And when included in the outrageous list is a photo of a fully clothed woman clutching her breasts. Not something we expect in polite company nor something you would need to visit a burlesque show for. And certainly less voyeuristic than Eve’s naked image on the Sistine Ceiling.

Yes they included one depraved video. That happens to be in it’s unedited version on Youtube for the entire world to see at their leisure. And while it was removed from the show, the resulting press coverage guarantees it will be viewed by millions. The remainder of the display looks like it has anticipated themes of loneliness, Isolation, Frustration, and Hiding in Plain Sight.


33 posted on 12/09/2010 2:45:02 PM PST by The_Repugnant_Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah

Do you really suppose people were more moral in 15th century Italy?


35 posted on 12/09/2010 4:52:23 PM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson