Replies

And so on. It also makes recommendations on joint duty assignments, relocations, medical implications, and re-accessions for those who were discharged under DADT.

I post this because there is a perception that all that is involved is just allowing people to be "honest" (barf). It isn't.

This is just another military social engineering project. In this case, the goal is same sex "marriage" acceptance throughout the DOD community.

So let’s see if I have this right. The government regulates our food intake in the name of our health, going so far as to ban toys as an incentive to buy a McDonald’s Happy Meal. BUT will condone anal sex and other forms of sodomy KNOWN to transmit disease, in the name of....of...someone help me out here?

From above:
“Accordingly, we recommend the Department of Defense expressly prohibit the designation of separate facilities based on sexual orientation,”

So then they are recommending that men and women use the same facilities? Men and women will bunk and shower together? Or are they going to create another new inequity and only use separate facilities in regard to possible heterosexual perceptions of privacy? But then force people to bunk and shower with someone who openly expresses a same-gender perversion?

Also to add, there is no such thing as ‘sexual orientation’. It is a made up meaningless term to make it seem as if homosexual behavior and perversions are normal. They are not.

There is a deeper, more insulting consequent of this message.

The humans who are in positions of leadership within the DoD today have not come to this perverted state overnight.

They are extremely corrupt, dishonest, unfaithful, disloyal, traitorous, arrogant, human trash seeking to squander whatever is placed in their charge. They deserve the reputation they have now given themselves for all eternity future.

Through faith in Christ, they may find redemption, but they have lost many an eternal reward in heaven, if they return to Him, which is a far better place than the one they seek to build and are attempting to destine for themselves and those around them.

Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

Anyone who says or thinks (and there are some on FR) that there is no "gay" agenda, or that any "gay" agenda does affect them, is actually saying that the homosexual agenda doesn't bother them. Why would it not bother them? Because they're on board with it. There is no other reason. Leftists want to push the agenda of same sex sodomy and as a plus, destroy the military. The military protects our freedoms, and we owe it to the military to support their right to not have homosexuals ruining it.

"We do not recommend segregated housing for gay or lesbian Service members. We believe this would do more harm than good for unit cohesion, create a climate of stigmatization and isolation, and be impossible to enforce or administer unless Service members are required to disclose their sexual orientation. On the other hand, we are sensitive to concerns expressed to us by commanders that disputes may arise between gay and straight Service members assigned to live together involving, at least to some extent, sexual orientation. Commanders should have the flexibility, on a case-by-case basis, to addresses those concerns in the interests of maintaining morale, good order, and discipline.

Accordingly, we recommend that the Department of Defense expressly prohibit berthing or billeting assignments based on sexual orientation,

What? They worry about reduced unit cohesion resulting from the fact that those who choose to engage in homosexual sex might be identified YET they push to have those disordered homosexual sex "dispruptors" imposed upon the military?

They realize this leftist imposed experiment in perversion acceptance by mandatory exposure will most like create a difficult situation and impact unit cohesion so they leave it up to the commanders to fist pretend it is not a problem and then have the "leeway" to be able to deal with it? Do commanders now need special homosexual sex laws passed to be able to house and discipline their troops?

Why deal with an imposed problem -why impose the problem in the first place?