Don't shoot messenger for revealing uncomfortable truths

The Australian ^ | 12/7/10 | Julian Assange

[Fundamentally Fair]

There's something about the 2004 members...

[LomanBill]

[For me, it's not about who leaked it, it's about it being leaked to him.]

 

It's a symptom of a society that has been subverted and demoralized.

 

The simple Truth the MSM (and others) are ignoring - is that a homosexual private got PO'd and leaked information because he doesn't like DADT. 

 

And now he/she/it is a big hero to the miscreants in Berkely who he/she/it obviously has more in common with than those who serve in the military because they love this country instead of conspiring to destroy it.

 

The Weather Underground would have loved to have an operative like Bradley Manning.  How did he/she/it get into the Pentagon?

 

It's not a simple matter of technological security; it's a question of how to undo 50 years of subversive indoctrination that gave military and political power to miscreants who care more about achieving the goals of Homosexual activism, than they do about securing this Republic.

 

History has seen this before:

 

"pre-World War II Germany and its quest for reviving and imitating a Hellenistic-paganistic idea of homo-eroticism and militarism."

 

Is it 1933 yet, again?

 

 

[Arrowhead1952]

I usually go by their posting history. Someone who hasn’t posted since signing up in 2004, 2006, or 2008 and then starts on a single subject like immigration, is always suspect.

[LomanBill]

[I’m just stunned how many are falling for the media’s corruption]

 

Imagine what Goebbels and Co. could have done with HD 5.1 digital surround in the living rooms of the sheeple...

 

And here we are.

 

 

 

[Fundamentally Fair]

I usually go by their posting history.

I do too. I just find an inordinate amount of trollish behavior from members with 2004 sign up dates.