Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sukhoi-30mki

F14 = Same engines as F111 - Just a purpose designed airframe
JSF = another cookie cutter aircraft using 1 engine fromm the F-22 development. ( And not the best part )


3 posted on 12/08/2010 1:24:33 AM PST by Waverunner (I'd like to welcome our new overlords, say hello to my little friend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Waverunner
Royal Australian Air Force Retires Its F-111 Fleet

yitbos

4 posted on 12/08/2010 1:38:07 AM PST by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Waverunner

Another of McNamara’s gifts to the US military.

TC


5 posted on 12/08/2010 2:02:48 AM PST by Pentagon Leatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Waverunner
Those ‘same engines’ were very problematic in the F-14A.

Missile technology and ROE did not support the missileer concept. The previous design was for a straight wing loitering aircraft that would simply fire the Phoenix missiles from afar and never engage in close combat. Vietnam experience killed that.

In fact, the F-14’s capability as a fighter was greatly limited by the design requirement to carry six Phoenix missiles.

The trouble in a sense is that no distinction is made between a fighter and an interceptor. The F-14 was an interceptor that could be forced into a fighter role.

11 posted on 12/08/2010 3:47:04 AM PST by SampleMan (If all of the people currently oppressed shared a common geography, bullets would already be flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson