Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Palter

Interesting.

The talk of moral obligation is always directed towards the individual involved in a transaction with a corporation, but it never works the other way around corporation.

If you have a dispute your mortgage holder, a bank, credit card holder, car lien holder, and go into court and start talking about thier “moral obligation” to you, you’ll get laughed out of court. The only thing that matters as far as a corporation goes is its “legal obligation.”

If corporations don’t have a moral obligation towards an individual they are doing business with, why does the individual have a moral obligation towards the corporation for the same given transaction?


3 posted on 12/08/2010 6:37:55 AM PST by Brookhaven (Voter Fraud is Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Brookhaven

Agreed. I am way upside down (like many) and have considered walking away but there are so many emotional aspects to a “home” not just the structure of the house.


4 posted on 12/08/2010 6:43:46 AM PST by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven
An interesting point. Since a corporation is a legal entity, it is ruled by legal obligations. One of the reason corporations exist is to transfer and legal and economic obligations from the owners to the corporation.

The question I thought of is: can a corporation (not the people working for it or the owners, but just the legal entity) have moral obligations as well?

13 posted on 12/08/2010 6:59:10 AM PST by kosciusko51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven

A very good question. One that will draw a lot of ridicule from the morality police here at FR, though none will bother to answer you.


27 posted on 12/08/2010 7:46:02 AM PST by Future Snake Eater ("Get out of the boat and walk on the water with us!”--Sen. Joe Biden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven; Future Snake Eater

You asked, “If corporations don’t have a moral obligation towards an individual they are doing business with, why does the individual have a moral obligation towards the corporation for the same given transaction?”

Because my morality does not depend upon the behavior of others but is a matter between me and God.

The “But Timmy did it!” excuse expires in first grade.

That old “two wrongs don’t make a right” thing.


31 posted on 12/08/2010 7:54:55 AM PST by Jedidah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Brookhaven
The talk of moral obligation is always directed towards the individual involved in a transaction with a corporation, but it never works the other way around corporation.

Corporations are owned by individual shareholders, they don't care about morality, they care about profits.

33 posted on 12/08/2010 7:56:59 AM PST by dfwgator (Congratulations to Josh Hamilton - AL MVP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson