Posted on 12/08/2010 10:51:35 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg
Ping.
How convenient for the prosecutors.
Talk about a fishy sounding story.
Something stinks about this story.
Weird. Just very weird.
I have done a lot of hazmat clean-up work and burning this kind of stuff is the LAST thing you want to even have happen.
Contaminate the whole neighborhood, chemical cloud coating everything...
Something isn’t right here.
—don’t believe anything the media or the government tells you about explosives or firearms-—
They can’t deal with the chemicals inside, so they’re going to set fire to the house, exposing untold thousands to toxic fumes, and so forth?
I call BS.
Plus bomb making materials...are they tryin’ to blow up the whole city?
I’m sure nothing can possibly go wrong! Big Badda Boom!
And no, there's nothing "fishy" about the story. This guy has spent way too much time playing with chemicals in his suburban home, and in the process, has created an enormous amount of highly-unstable, yet incredibly explosive compound. There's not way to clear out the materials without risking a massive explosion. So, the most prudent public safety solution is to evacuate and burn it to the ground.
Probably some terrorists smuggled across the Mexican border were renters. Wonder why they abandoned it? Already made what they needed?
So FIRE and HEAT...
Sorry, can’t convince me this is going to come off as anything like a controlled burn.
Fine, let him go inside and get them.
Did you read the freakin' story?
Who said anything about it coming off "as a controlled burn"? The place is packed floor to ceiling with UNSTABLE HIGHLY-EXPLOSIVE compounds. If they move some of them, they're certain some will explode. They can't let a house sit in a neighborhood with this kind of volatility. So, the prudent measure is to evacuate people to a safe zone, and hope that the fire will burn the chemicals, rather than acting as a catalyst for an explosion. Either way - safe burn, or massive explosion, it's better than letting it go up on its own, or when someone is inside trying to remove the materials.
It's a risk, but it's the most managed risk.
I guess you just rather leave them there, and put up a no-trespassing sign.
I read the story. It doesn't mention who owns the house, only the name of the renter.
Honestly, doc, did you read the story that you posted, at all?
He's not Syrian. He has an ethic Slovakian, not Arab. For those that don't know, Slovakia is comprised almost entirely of Catholics or Eastern Orthodox citizens (or Atheists). No Syrians, no Arabs, no Muzzies.
The renter is Serbian.
I’m sure all of you remember when the city of Philadelphia, in a botched attempt to arrest militant MOVE members, dropped a bomb on their house. As a result, five children and six adults were killed and 61 homes were burned down!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.