Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Niteflyr
"Yeah and the Pentagon response "unlikely it was a missile"? What the @#!*% is that? I think I deserve as a tax-paying citizen living in the area a little more definitive answer from our "protectors"."

Then why don't you read the actual statement?

"The Dept. of Defense statement from Col. Dave Lapan, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, reads:

"While there is nothing at this time that leads the Department of Defense to believe this is a missile launch, the department and other U.S. government agencies with expertise in aviation and space continue to look into the condensation trail (CONTRAIL) seen and reported off the coast of southern California on Monday evening.

"All DoD entities with rocket and missile programs reported no launches, scheduled or inadvertent, during the time period in the area of the reported contrail. NORAD and USNORTHCOM confirmed that it did not monitor any foreign military missile launch off the California coast yesterday and has determined that there was no threat to the US homeland.

"In addition, the FAA ran radar replays from Monday afternoon of a large area west of Los Angeles. Those replays did not reveal any fast-moving, unidentified targets. The FAA also did not receive reports of any unusual sightings from pilots who were flying in the area Monday afternoon.

"If any new information comes to light in the coming days, we will update the press and public."

538 posted on 12/16/2010 8:21:43 PM PST by Rokke (www.therightreasons.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 522 | View Replies ]


To: Rokke
I can copy and paste too...see? :o)

Inquiries made by the Northeast Intelligence Network has so far verified the following:

- There were no warning or advisories to aircraft or air traffic controllers. According to one supervisory ATC from LAX interviewed today, “this was totally unexpected.”

- No U.S. missile tests were scheduled or conducted at that time and location, according to a Pentagon contact;
–Pentagon source 9 November 2010 1510 hours ET

- “This was not an accidental launch. The methods required to launch a missile of this size and presumed type is too complex and involves more than one person, that’s all I can say.”
– Pentagon source; 9 November 2010; 1510 hours ET

–”Oh yes, they know exactly where it came from and what type of missile it was, but are not saying. There are a lot of meetings taking place right now inside the ring [a reference to the Pentagon].”
– Pentagon source; 9 November 2010; 1510 hours ET

–”China, Russia, Iran, France are four countries that have the capabilities for this type type of launch. And of course, we do too. But it was not us. There’s scuttlebut about a cargo ship and China, but that’s all it is, scuttlebut.”
– Pentagon source; 9 November 2010; 1510 hours ET

550 posted on 12/16/2010 11:57:50 PM PST by Niteflyr ("The number one goal in life is to parent yourself" Carl Jung)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson