To: ColdOne
I hate it when they call American troops “NATO troops.” It’s all part of Obama’s campaign to make the US unimportant.
That said, why in the world are we not defending ourselves better against these attacks from local Muslims? Every week we read about an “Afghan policeman” or “Afghan interpreter” or “Afghan military recruit” blowing up or shooting numbers of our people. Why are they allowed to get this close to our forces?
18 posted on
12/12/2010 12:02:02 PM PST by
livius
To: livius
I hate it when they call American troops NATO troops. Its all part of Obamas campaign to make the US unimportant. That said, why in the world are we not defending ourselves better against these attacks from local Muslims? Every week we read about an Afghan policeman or Afghan interpreter or Afghan military recruit blowing up or shooting numbers of our people. Why are they allowed to get this close to our forces? I thought it had to do with 0. I am thinking these Soldiers died because of the R.O.E. orders.
21 posted on
12/12/2010 12:11:59 PM PST by
ColdOne
To: livius
That said, why in the world are we not defending ourselves better against these attacks from local Muslims? Every week we read about an Afghan policeman or Afghan interpreter or Afghan military recruit blowing up or shooting numbers of our people. Why are they allowed to get this close to our forces?Because we sent out forces ~7,000 miles around the world to be in the midst of them. Maybe you think we can build a puppet government and army by some other method, I'm all ears.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson