“Isn’t this just another take on the “racist newsletter monthly” that was used to smear him during the 2008 primaries, and later shown to be untrue?”
They weren’t “shown to be untrue.”
The best Paul came up with was admitting it was anti-semetic garbage in his newsletters for years-and-years, but claiming he didn’t write the newsletter that went out under his name, nor read it.
Sorry, one article, maybe. Years and years of anti-semetic tripe? No excuse.
And, yes, I have confirmed by reading the newsletters myself.
In a vacuum? Maybe.
Coupled with the fact that Paul is also a non-interventionist-of-convenience (only when it harms Israel), it’s apparent what Paul is.
Paul is a slightly-more-subtle version of his friend David Duke.
Point taken - I believe it was shown that not only was he not the author, he wasn't even involved in the day-to-day operations of the newsletter at the time the articles (racist ones) were published.
Sorry, one article, maybe. Years and years of anti-semetic tripe? No excuse
Source? I'd like to read them for myself.
Coupled with the fact that Paul is also a non-interventionist-of-convenience (only when it harms Israel), it’s apparent what Paul is
Complete BS - I've got the text of a speech he gave on the floor of the House of Reps back in the '80s, condemning the US & French gov'ts for brokering the deal that let the PLO escape from Beirut when the Israelis were about to exterminate them - yasser arafat should have died a violent, painful death at the hands of Israeli soldiers but didn't because of Ronald Reagan... does that make RR a jooo-hater too?
...his friend David Duke
Quickly prove they've ever even met or you've lost all credibility...