Replies

In United States v. Rhodes (1866), Mr. Justice Swayne, sitting in the Circuit Court, said:

All persons born in the allegiance of the King are natural-born subjects

191 posted on Wednesday, December 15, 2010 6:06:50 PM by Mr Rogers

We’re still waiting, rogers ole boy. Kind of slow-witted aren’t you, rogers ole boy?

Why don’t you man up, rogers ole boy, and admit that you are wrong and not knowledgeable enough of the law, any law, to answer any of my questions or refute any of my legal arguments?

Thank you for posting the essay supporting the FACT that BO, by his own admission, was born a British subject and consequently BO is NOT a Natural Born Citizen of the United States, and NOT QUALIFIED to be POTUS.

Here’s another assignment for you, Rogers, ole boy. See if you can find a single case that refutes the FACT the BO is subject to the Original Jurisdiction of SCOTUS for lawsuits contesting his illegitimate pResidency.

http://thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2010/07/taking-aka-obama-directly-before-scotus.html

CAAflog’s dillies are now on .. Blog Talk Radio

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/show.aspx?userurl=rcr&year=2010&month=12&day=16&url=rc-radio-special—lakin-court-martial-day-2

It didn’t just start .. I had to click where it says open in your default player or another window and play it thru my computer.

Apparently, some troop Edwards said something negative
at the hearing. Haven’t gotten the gist.

Now, they’re choking down giggles and chortles about some witness they’re labeling a ‘birther.’

Oh yes .. they’re having a barrel of laughs here.