So if a politician does ONE thing you don’t agree with, but does 99 things you do, you throw him overboard?
“So if a politician does ONE thing you don’t agree with, but does 99 things you do, you throw him overboard?”
Are you really that simple minded? Lets see if I get this straight - so according to your simple minded theory - said politician could vote 99% conservative but if he voted to have the american people enslaved that would be ok because he votes with conservatives 99% of the time. What an idiot you show yourself to be with such arguments.
Sometimes certain issues are much bigger than other issues -it is these issues that seperate the true patriots and constitutionalists from the central bank controlled RINOs. DADT and the DREAM act are two such issues - regardless of how they voted in the past these two define who the politicians are accountable to. A no vote means they are accountable to the people, a yes vote means they could give a crap about the people and majority and are doing the will of the bankers and political elitists.
ONE thing?
It is a big “ONE” thing not some dip dunk vote for some pork barrel project, the ending of DADT is the keystone for mainstreaming the Homosexual Agenda, more or less their version of Roe v Wade.
Spare the minimization.
If you went to party and a host offered you a glass of punch from a punch bowl filled with 99 ounces of punch and a one ounce turd, would you drink it?
Toomey is kind of libertarian being in that Club for Growth which thinks the free market can cure anything, even toe fungus. There are lots of gay libertarians he has encountered that he feels sympatico with. This is why he said this about DADT. Gays tend to be anarchistic and so do libertarians. Gays want sexual anarchy. Getting the picture now?
Gays want the kind of sexual anarchy that denies 5000+ years of Judeo-Christian thought and tradition. They feel they can do better. Actually gay sexual anarchy (men marrying men) is a return to pre-Judaic paganism