Skip to comments.
House passes temporary extension of Bush-era tax cuts 277-148
The Hill ^
| December 16, 2010
| Russell Berman and Mike Lillis
Posted on 12/16/2010 9:30:45 PM PST by Second Amendment First
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
To: Second Amendment First
What have they done? They just don’t hear the people...
Now Obama will take credit for this as HIS tax cuts but this will go down in history as the largest stimulus ever done and it will add yet ANOTHER TRILLION to our debt...
What are they thinking?
21
posted on
12/16/2010 11:08:32 PM PST
by
surfer
(To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
To: TXConservative25
I shook his hand at a book signing here in Phoenix last week. It was awesome and memorable. Brought back to mind that old saying about not missing what you had-until you don’t have it any longer.
22
posted on
12/16/2010 11:10:13 PM PST
by
ScoopAmma
(We are led by the Resident -in Chief; aka part-time member of Webelo Troop 44)
To: Second Amendment First
Can the next Congress, successfully, fix things and greatly improve things, for the long-term future of the U.S.? A question very similar to my, still, used tagline.
23
posted on
12/16/2010 11:49:14 PM PST
by
johnthebaptistmoore
(If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
To: Second Amendment First
We are sorry that the free world paid such a terrible price for supporting this madman in the White House.
24
posted on
12/17/2010 12:21:10 AM PST
by
Carley
(ISRAEL.......NOT SO ALONE!!!)
To: TXConservative25
"To see Bushs predecessor and successor lobbying for his tax cuts brought a certain joy to my heart." Precisely. Bush won the tax policy debate. 100%.
25
posted on
12/17/2010 12:33:54 AM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: 21twelve
We already tried cutting taxes and that didnt work.....
That is exactly how they will spin it and, I believe, this is what they are counting on. However, I have faith in the American people...most of them, anyway.
We aren’t idiots...even those who aren’t political junkies know when someone is trying to make a bad situation worse.
This would be that time...and this repulsive bill wouldn’t have had a prayer without Republican votes.
Elections matter..........we won..........pfft.
26
posted on
12/17/2010 12:42:20 AM PST
by
dixiechick2000
("First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win." - Gandhi)
To: Qbert
Michele Bachmann and Joe Wilson vote NO!
27
posted on
12/17/2010 12:49:45 AM PST
by
onyx
(If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
To: 21twelve
It’s all the other things in the bill such as extending unemployment 13 weeks that is so horrible!!
28
posted on
12/17/2010 1:27:52 AM PST
by
dalereed
To: Second Amendment First
I can't believe they went two years on this. Try to imagine two years from now with unemployment most likely still above 9%, and the anointed one starts saying we need to elect him to raise taxes. In my whole life I've never seen someone elected or re elected promising to raise taxes. He just may be a one term POTUS. Even if we get into the 8% levels, do you want to muck it up raising taxes?
He's toast.
29
posted on
12/17/2010 2:01:39 AM PST
by
chuckles
To: Second Amendment First
How is this a victory for 0bama when he wanted to soak the “rich”?
30
posted on
12/17/2010 2:10:49 AM PST
by
Redcloak
(What's your zombie plan?)
To: TXConservative25
To see Bushs predecessor and successor lobbying for his tax cuts brought a certain joy to my heart. Politics make the strangest of bedfellows.
31
posted on
12/17/2010 2:12:53 AM PST
by
newzjunkey
(expired "Bush tax cut" = Obama Tax Increase)
To: Southack
And America loses. And not because of extending the taxcuts, but because of all the other garbage that is in this bill.
32
posted on
12/17/2010 2:17:11 AM PST
by
Revel
To: Second Amendment First
Frank and Fudge voted NO. Why does he get two votes?
Pence also voted NO.
33
posted on
12/17/2010 2:32:56 AM PST
by
bIlluminati
(Don't just hope for change, work for change in 2011-2012.)
To: Hoodat; Qbert; bergmeid; Second Amendment First
Technically, the bill originated in the House, which passed the Airport and Airway Extension Act of 2010. That House bill was then taken up by the Senate, which amended it to (i) eliminate all of the airport language and (ii) add all of the income-tax rate, estate tax, social security tax and unemployment paymeng language. The bill then went back to the House, which last night voted to approve the Senate amendment that did all that.
So, due to this shell game, the link showing how everyone voted last night did not have the incorrect bill name, and the tax bill did “originate” in the House as required by the Constitution.
34
posted on
12/17/2010 2:39:23 AM PST
by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
To: dalereed
You mean 13 months. I would prefer it to be 13 weeks! I sure do hope that decent welfare reforms will be created, by the next Congress and beyond! Welfare reforms that encourage ALL ABLE BODIED PEOPLE HERE LEGALLY to go back to work asap are, still, very desperately, needed!
35
posted on
12/17/2010 2:39:39 AM PST
by
johnthebaptistmoore
(If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
To: Second Amendment First
The GOP-favored inheritance tax of 35% for individuals worth more than $5 million, the Speaker said, is not good policy. It does have not have a favorable impact on the deficit. It does not create jobs, It does not grow the economy. ...it does not outright mug families with small businesses and farm any more than about 1 out of every 3 dollars they are passing on to their children. It is still OUTRAGEOUS.
To: Second Amendment First
I applaud President Obama for his side of the ledger, Pelosi said.Barry threatened her with a bucket of water to get her to say that.
37
posted on
12/17/2010 3:30:21 AM PST
by
South40
(If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace. ~Thomas Paine)
To: Second Amendment First
"In a floor speech Thursday night, Pelosi endorsed the estate tax amendment but pointedly refused to explicitly back the underlying bill. The GOP-favored inheritance tax of 35% for individuals worth more than $5 million, the Speaker said, is not good policy. It does have not have a favorable impact on the deficit. It does not create jobs, It does not grow the economy."Since when does taxes cause deficits you dimwits?? What about SPENDING? GOT IT NOW? or do you need another dose of voter anger in 2012?
38
posted on
12/17/2010 3:34:08 AM PST
by
Bobby_Taxpayer
(Don't tread on us...or you'll pay the price in the next election.)
To: 21twelve
So, in two years, Tea Party candidates will be campaigning for reduced taxes, etc. With this crappy tax plan the economy will be in no better shape, and the libs will use it against us. We already tried cutting taxes and that didnt work.....The first post that gets it. This was/is a trap and the stupid GOP fell for it. We need actual cuts not this extension.
39
posted on
12/17/2010 3:47:37 AM PST
by
raybbr
(Someone who invades another country is NOT an immigrant - illegal or otherwise.)
To: Hoodat
Going into my self-managed Roth.
40
posted on
12/17/2010 4:31:21 AM PST
by
SueRae
(I can see November 2012 from my HOUSE!!!!!!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-99 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson