Legislature should move on; gay marriage fight isn't worth it ZOT!

Concord Monitor ^ | 12-18-10 | oe Solmonese

[freekitty]

What are you talking about?

[Doomonyou]

Jim Thompson is on a mission today!

[EternalVigilance]

it is a moral issue our Congress has no business being involved in it.

Explain what you meant, and why I'm wrong to say that such a statement is insane.

[freekitty]

I don’t deny any of that and you are a fool. Society should be the judge; not lawyers; government; etc.

[EternalVigilance]

Again, that’s insane.

[freekitty]

I did in 3 posts.

[freekitty]

Also, please don’t dictate to me. You sound like an idiot.

[EternalVigilance]

You don’t even understand what legitimate government is.

[freekitty]

And you do? All I see is a pompous fool mouthing off.

[EternalVigilance]

All I see is an insult per post from you.

All I said is that to deny the moral component of government is insane.

Quite literally. Disconnected from reality. The kind of disconnect from reality that leads people off cliffs.

[Gene Eric]

>> Article: The sky has not fallen. Clocks have not stopped.

The argument of assholes.

[pallis]

Do it quickly, and move onto other business. No sense whining about things.

[jpsb]

I am certainly opposed to legalizing homosexual unions, defacto endorsing perversion IMHO. But I think the best idea is to get gov out of the marriage business ENTIRELY. No marriage license for anyone let the churches handle marriage not gov. Which of course means changing tax laws and maybe a few other laws, but that is fine with me too.

[EternalVigilance]

The radical gays stand up and cheer when they hear your Ron Paul-inspired libertarian position voiced. They literally do. I’ve seen it in public forums.

They are dividing and conquering now, and your silly position gives them the cover they need to finish the job of destroying this free republic.

[EternalVigilance]

You may not realize it, but that is actually complete surrender.

[jpsb]

Allowing the churches to define marriage is surrender? No gov benefit for being married and no gov benefit for not being married is surrender? I just do not see it. I would certainly keeps laws against sodomy and petifilla on the books but let the states do that has they see fit.

[EternalVigilance]

You either defend the natural moral law on every front, or you surrender our country. That’s the stark reality.

[freekitty]

I have told you how I feel. You flew in insulting from your first post. Now get lost.

[pigsmith]

"Our country isn't falling apart because of neglect. Our country is falling apart because we've turned our back on God and have become so morally corrupt we can't even see how far we've fallen."

In a nutshell.

[EternalVigilance]

Yeah, cause I’m sick and tired of the libertarian nonsense you espoused. It’s helping to destroy our country.