Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why atheism can't replace religion
Psychology Today ^ | Dec 16 2010 | Michael W. Austin

Posted on 12/18/2010 5:45:06 PM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: Louis Foxwell

note name change per this thread.


81 posted on 12/19/2010 5:00:31 AM PST by Louis Foxwell (pka: Amos the Prophet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ottbmare

Where are you?

We’re in New England.

Very few bright spots for Christ up here. When you try to share Christ with folks up here, they will tell you that they’re “all set”.


82 posted on 12/19/2010 6:07:47 AM PST by Westbrook (Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Abin Sur

True faith does not come from praying. Faith comes from the word of God (Bible) and his sacraments.

Prayers are our conversing with our Lord.


83 posted on 12/19/2010 6:15:37 AM PST by Vegasrugrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Abin Sur

> The human race divides politically into those who want
> people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.

Almost the same as what I propose, and that is ...

The human race divides politically into those who want to be left alone to pursue their interests and dreams, and meddling busybodies who think they know what’s best for everybody and work to impose their worldview on everybody.

Unfortunately, the former are usually too busy working, raising families, building, and contributing economically to run for political office, while the latter make their living by running for political office, having their lives supported by the very people they desire to control.

Many, if not most, of these politicians have never done an honest day’s work in their lives. Like our president and virtually his entire staff, they have lived off tax moneys since getting out of college, which was also likely paid for by tax moneys.

Solution: Starve the beast.

Any politician who does not have a real business that becomes a millionaire while in office, and there are many, many of these, should have his finances investigated to the minutest detail. Any anomalies should immediately disqualify him from public office and expose him to criminal action with jail time.


84 posted on 12/19/2010 6:25:25 AM PST by Westbrook (Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: seowulf

Interesting... never thought of it that way— “narcissistic religion.”

It is based on bitterness, too. The atheist may have been hurt at some point.


85 posted on 12/19/2010 7:51:00 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
Just for the record, it is possible for one to be an atheist without considering one's self to be a god or being bitter and having been hurt at some point.

I see no reason to believe that the supernatural exists. It really is as simple as that.

86 posted on 12/19/2010 8:05:44 AM PST by Abin Sur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

I live in one of the collar counties of Washington DC. They can’t build churches fast enough here. It’s SRO on Sunday mornings, and the churches open branch offices and livestream the services to make it easier for people to hear the Word. Many or most of the new ones are nondenominational, conservative churches; the mainstream Protestant churches aren’t having much luck, though thousands are joining the Catholic Church.


87 posted on 12/19/2010 8:07:41 AM PST by ottbmare (off-the-track Thoroughbred mare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: ottbmare
This says something about the hunger people have to hear Christ preach. (Edited)

I'd take Him over a Swaggart every time.

88 posted on 12/19/2010 8:20:49 AM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: stboz

Sadly, He hasn’t been around in the last 2,000 years.


89 posted on 12/19/2010 8:22:39 AM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Why can't atheism replace religion? Case in point:

Self-sacrificing degrees of greatness are untenable when there is nothing great worth sacrificing for.

90 posted on 12/19/2010 8:31:29 AM PST by ctdonath2 (+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Why must something be offered? It is the failing weakness of the human being that make him/her believe. Is it not possible to live life for it’s own sake? Must we reach for some intangible hereafter that promises, (yes promises) a better “life” “place” “existence” in an afterlife? We knew nothing of the world or God before we were born. We are only here because of our ability to swim harder and faster than a million other sperm, so why are we so special? Even this can be argued as being the will of God as can anything and everything according to religion.

Blastphemy you say? A man made concept to marginalize those who might think differently from the masses.

For those to whom religion is a comfort, I say be comforted
and enjoy the peace of mind that religious comfort provides.

As for the atheists, they too live in peace and comfort believing in their non belief.

Practitioners of a religious belief system believe that someday they will rejoice in heaven and there is nothing wrong with that.

Agnostics believe in some force of nature but cannot define what that is, it may be God or some other omnipotent being and there is nothing wrong with that.

Atheists believe that when life over, it’s over, that’s all there is and there’s nothing wrong with that either.

So debate it if you wish, believe what you wish. If the believers are right, good for them. If the Atheists are right, it really won’t matter.


91 posted on 12/19/2010 8:50:24 AM PST by greyfox (If I were a Democrat I'd be pushing for the fairness doctrine too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: seowulf

This is pure unadulterated nonsense. Intellecual masturbation. When we both die you can tell me how right you were in that wonderful afterlife.


92 posted on 12/19/2010 8:57:32 AM PST by greyfox (If I were a Democrat I'd be pushing for the fairness doctrine too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Abin Sur

Agreed. However, that is a individual choice. And my point was a generalization.

I have known some very angry atheists. It was as if they had something to prove. And they did it with an intensity that would be considered “fanatic.”

The larger point: for a person to say that there isn’t a higher existence takes as much of a leap of faith as person who believes in a higher existence.

It also depends on what you define as a religion, too: 1. organized religion and the dogma and ritual that goes with it or 2. a higher, generalized belief in a “creator.” An observation that the universe and its laws are not random and therefor there is a plan and a planner.


93 posted on 12/19/2010 10:21:48 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: randog
I can say with experience that for many (myself included) it wasn't a conscious effort, a need for a "fix", a desire to be part of a social group, etc., but rather a supernatural event. IOW, a miraculous event or series of events take place in believer's lives, undeniable evidence of God's existence.

That's certainly one form the experience can take, In fact if you believe in a god with a direct interest in human lives, on some level that's what the experience *has* to be.

94 posted on 12/19/2010 12:52:30 PM PST by M. Dodge Thomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
Interestingly, atheism is more of an anti-Christian religion than anything else. If Christianity ceased to exist, atheism would have no purpose.

If Christianity ceased to exist, other religions would step up to fill the vacuum. I would surmise that those religions which are more aggressive with respect to gaining converts would dominate. In my opinion, that would be Islam.

95 posted on 12/19/2010 3:44:41 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse (unite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
I have known some very angry atheists. It was as if they had something to prove. And they did it with an intensity that would be considered “fanatic.”

I've never known an angry atheist, as least on a personal basis. They certainly exist...but then, so do angry fanatical believers of all stripes.

The larger point: for a person to say that there isn’t a higher existence takes as much of a leap of faith as person who believes in a higher existence.

I agree, which is why I don't affirmatively deny a higher existence; I just have no belief in it.

It also depends on what you define as a religion, too: 1. organized religion and the dogma and ritual that goes with it or 2. a higher, generalized belief in a “creator.” An observation that the universe and its laws are not random and therefor there is a plan and a planner.

I would tend to prefer the first definition. #2 sounds more like Deism, which is more of a philosophical viewpoint than a religion per se.

96 posted on 12/19/2010 5:57:48 PM PST by Abin Sur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
But for some reason, atheists (some?) go after Christians.
Maybe because they know that if they were to criticize Islam, they'd be dead. Don't hear them making a big stink about Judaism, either. Or Hinduism, etc. etc.
97 posted on 12/19/2010 8:29:50 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Abin Sur

Fanatics... I have met a couple. I have met a few fanatical Christians, too.

“I agree, which is why I don’t affirmatively deny a higher existence; I just have no belief in it.”

Interesting. Makes sense. And an important distinction.

So are you an agnostic?


98 posted on 12/19/2010 8:45:13 PM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345
Atheist, but negative atheism instead of positive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_atheism

It would be wonderful if God and an afterlife existed, but in the absence of evidence I have no reason to think that it's so...but I don't know that I'm right in the manner that those who affirm or deny God's existence think that they do.

99 posted on 12/19/2010 9:55:54 PM PST by Abin Sur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Abin Sur
Well said.

You have thought this through.

My belief...

What we observe through our senses is a deception. Our senses are specialized and are designed to insure our survival in the physical world.

One way of bypassing the senses is to use math and the scientific process to more accurately describe the real world — quantum mechanics. I recommend the Dancing WuLi Masters.... if your are interested.

100 posted on 12/20/2010 9:14:39 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson