Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawrence O'Donnell Attacks Coulter for Saying Liberals Give Less to Charity Than Conservatives
NewsBusters ^ | December 22, 2010 | Noel Sheppard

Posted on 12/27/2010 12:09:36 PM PST by Syncro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Syncro

I notice Crazy Larry didn’t attempt to claim that libs give more charity than conservatives, he just plugged some charity that he’s got his name on. Not the same deal, Larry.


21 posted on 12/27/2010 12:36:51 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Did it look something like this??”

I think that’s his oldest boy, Theodore ... named after Ded Kennedy (D-HELL) his hero.


22 posted on 12/27/2010 12:36:52 PM PST by jessduntno ("'How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think." - Adolph Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Hey, isn’t that Lawrence O’Donnell? I didn’t know he celebrated Christmas.


23 posted on 12/27/2010 12:37:51 PM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

The story below goes times 100 for the crowd in Washington.

One of the bits of information I picked up while lobbying on the money issue down at the old gold dome is that each year, the legislature publishes a list of all the bills they passed during the session. It used to be called the “Legislative Summary.” Probably still is.

I was absolutely FASCINATED when I opened the first one I came across. Right there on page one is the following verbiage: (I’m paraphrasing)

“No determination has been made as to the CONSTITUTIONALITY of any of the legislative acts summarized herein.”

That statement was signed by the Legislative Counsel (their lawyer).

Bottom line: If anyone thinks these guys have one eye on the state and national Constitutions as they mess with our lives, they’d better think again.

One of the NOT-SO-FUNNY experiences I had while mucking about down there was the night several of us were invited to one of the many lobbyist funded and euphemistically named “Hospitality Suites.” Legislators are invited to come by after the session ends each day to eat, drink and make merry (mostly drink).

As we walked down the hallway of the fashionable hotel where this particular suite was located, we followed two young freshmen legislators. They were just sauntering and talking and as we closed in from the rear to within earshot, one turned to the other and declared (and I swear on my sainted mother’s grave that this is true): “This is fun. It’s kinda like spending your own money — but it’s not REALLY your money.” Then they both laughed.

When we got to the suite — to which we’d been INVITED by the member who supported our particular issue, we were almost immediately — and very curtly — told to leave by another member who outranked our friend. Wouldn’t do to have ordinary CITIZENS overhearing the deals being made.

We’re clearly doomed.


24 posted on 12/27/2010 12:39:46 PM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

In Seattle, it was liberals who expanded the concept of “charities” to include arts organizations. Most conservatives would rightfully disagree with that usage.


25 posted on 12/27/2010 12:40:55 PM PST by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Giving money to the bureaucrats at the UN is not the same as helping children.


26 posted on 12/27/2010 12:41:30 PM PST by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno
LOL. Since you seem to be a fan, I have a few of these memorial issue CDs left and would be happy to send you one.
Photobucket

Someone really ought to erect a statue on the Mall to Mary Jo for keeping this reprobate out of the White House. She really DID give her life for her country.


27 posted on 12/27/2010 12:44:30 PM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

Why desks or sitting on the floor? How ‘bout some nice comfy couches?


28 posted on 12/27/2010 12:45:26 PM PST by murron (Proud Mom of a Marine Vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

I read a story a couple of years ago about this very thing.

The most generous; lower middle class with guys from Alabama gave a huge amount in proportion to their incomes to the poor
(less church giving) than the high income men in Massachutes.

In fact in state rankings, Alabama was 1st and Massachutes was dead last.

Another typical “do as I say, not as I do” liberal rule.


29 posted on 12/27/2010 12:45:33 PM PST by yellowhorse (6 good horses, 3 good women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

If you look at this charity a year from now, you’l be shocked, SHOCKED I tell you, to find almost no desks delivered and the funds siphoned off to who-knows-which-corrupt official.


30 posted on 12/27/2010 12:46:18 PM PST by jdsteel (CONGRESS: I like the way the words "Palin for President" drive socialists absolutely crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
I notice Crazy Larry didn’t attempt to claim that libs give more charity than conservatives, he just plugged some charity that he’s got his name on. Not the same deal, Larry.
Exactly.
31 posted on 12/27/2010 12:46:52 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20

That’s Mr. Mohammed Al Hankie, the Ramadan poo.
(His head towel was in the laundry for its annual washing so we had to make doo with the red hat for the photo shoot.)


32 posted on 12/27/2010 12:47:06 PM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

Ha! The Northeast arts-giver types I know think the flyover country Christians’ giving doesn’t count, because it’s mostly churchgoers giving to what in effect are the local social clubs (churches) of which they are members.


33 posted on 12/27/2010 12:47:53 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

He dares bring Rush in on this? Rush is the guy who auctioned off Harry Reid’s letter criticizing him for $2.1 million, matched that $2.1 million with his own money, and donated it all to kids. And there are all of those charity cigar auctions and golf tournaments he continually does.


34 posted on 12/27/2010 12:48:42 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

As of last night, UNICEF had processed over $600,000 in contributions to the K.I.N.D. Fund... Since I have fought in Africa, I KNOW each and every cent was spent on the military, the ‘GOVERNORS” or the bureaucrats who begged for this moohlah. In order for the “desks” to have arrived, been shipped and installed,it would have cost 8 times what this asshat is spouting.


35 posted on 12/27/2010 12:53:53 PM PST by Safetgiver (I'd rather die under a free American sky than live under a Socialist regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
And I beg you, Ann, to now show us just how charitable conservatives can be with their money. $48 a desk, $720 for a classroom. Come on, Ann, you can afford a classroom. And hey, if you can get Rush involved, he can buy desks for every kid in Malawi.

And if they do, he'll count that as liberal giving?

Interesting though that he pretty much admits that only liberals watch his show. After all, he used the giving from his show as proof that liberals give money, so he must be certain that there aren't any conservatives in his audience.

36 posted on 12/27/2010 12:54:18 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
O’Donnel says that each desk is $48. Almost $800 per Class. That is more than the entire economy of some of those towns.

Sounds like lots of administrative costs per desk!

37 posted on 12/27/2010 12:55:59 PM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Also, I checked his audience numbers, and one source said he had over a million viewers at some point.

Which means the average giving for his audience is around 70 CENTS.

Way to go, liberals. Giving up the foam on your latte for a day!!!


38 posted on 12/27/2010 12:57:20 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

“In Seattle, it was liberals who expanded the concept of “charities” to include arts organizations.”

I thought that was so the “artists” who polish driftwood and mount them on a stand could scam a few bucks from the suckers ....


39 posted on 12/27/2010 12:59:30 PM PST by jessduntno ("'How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think." - Adolph Hitler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

I remember when Bill Bradley was a serious contender for the Dem presidential ticket. His income was reported as somewhere over a quarter mil, and he had donated like $1000 to charity. All of his compassionate rhetoric really fell flat for me then.


40 posted on 12/27/2010 12:59:55 PM PST by BADROTOFINGER (Life sucks. Get a helmet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson