Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China's New Missile: A Game Changer?
Investor's Business Daily ^ | December 28, 2010 | IBD staff

Posted on 12/28/2010 7:43:01 PM PST by raptor22

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: grey_whiskers

Some of us are childishly optimistic. You don’t want to lose the carriers and be forced to consider attacking the Chinese mainland. Loss of the carriers prevents us from achieving our mission in the region, and risking a nuclear exchange is not where you want to be.


21 posted on 12/28/2010 8:01:35 PM PST by Williams (It's the policies, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

The price we’ve paid for handing China our manufacturing technology on a silver platter, just so fat ladies in stretchy pants can buy more chinese made crap at Walmart and Sears.


22 posted on 12/28/2010 8:01:52 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Really?

You think obamao has ANY desire to protect this country?

I don’t.

He is decimating our defensive capabilities and he WILL NOT do anything in the face of attack or provocation unless g. soros and the saudis tell him too.

He IS the enemy within and sooner or later the remaining patriots in our military are going to need to figure this out and DO something.

Illegal, non-constitutional orders are STILL illegal, non-constitutional orders.

obamao uber alles? I sure hope not.


23 posted on 12/28/2010 8:04:03 PM PST by 43north (BHO: 50% white, 50% black, 100% red)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

any possibility that the w88 technology has been projected into this missile which is launched into space?


24 posted on 12/28/2010 8:07:57 PM PST by Michigan Bowhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Williams

We better pack up and get our $hit out of there fast.


25 posted on 12/28/2010 8:10:23 PM PST by mmercier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Williams
risking a nuclear exchange is not where you want to be.

So you agree with the Kenyan Klown on nuclear disarmament?

I personally want our enemies to KNOW that we will nuke their ass if required.

26 posted on 12/28/2010 8:10:41 PM PST by Eaker (In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity. Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789
From what I’ve been reading, one 1,000 pound bomb would take down the Three Gorges Dam.

From what I have read they are keeping butterflies away from the crap-ass dam.

27 posted on 12/28/2010 8:15:49 PM PST by Eaker (In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity. Albert Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cisco Nix

“Pop a carrier and see how the game changes.”

With old Hope and Change in charge?

............................

Exactly!


28 posted on 12/28/2010 8:18:41 PM PST by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mmercier

Too true. If China actually sank a carrier, which would either require a nuke or multiple strikes, it would be war. Picture more dead than Pearl Harbor or 9/11 and massive nuclear contamination.

I choose not to believe China is that stupid.


29 posted on 12/28/2010 8:21:27 PM PST by oldleft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
They pop a carrier, we pop Three Gorges Dam.
Even trade.

Not even close. That three Gorges Dam if they are lucky will last 10 years.

30 posted on 12/28/2010 8:27:28 PM PST by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric cartman voice* 'I love you guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Williams
I got all that.

I assume commanders in theater would have some warning that their carrier was about to be incinerated. Do they have local authority to launch tactical nukes under a use'em or lose'em rationale?

31 posted on 12/28/2010 8:27:59 PM PST by DWar ("The ultimate destination of Political Correctness is totalitarianism.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn
Thought of casualties?
32 posted on 12/28/2010 8:30:23 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: oldleft
“I choose not to believe China is that stupid.”

They are not.

Those commanding a carrier group however, must assume that they are.

No one is going to surprise our navy with a mass attack again.

Ever.

33 posted on 12/28/2010 8:35:40 PM PST by mmercier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Eaker

I’m sorry but some of you are dangerously ignorant of military reality.

You think I am somehow siding with obama because I don’t want our conventional weaknesses to lead to a nuclear exchange?? Did it ever occur to you that I don’t give a rat’s ass if we could just nuke China without consequences after they defeat us in Asia?

I guess it never occurred to you that a nuclear exchange includes them nuking us. You don’t have to get there if you don’t lose conventionally in the first place. You don’t want to get there. IMHO conventional weakness may eventually lead to a devastating nuclear war with the Chinese, or else a huge loss of our World position.


34 posted on 12/28/2010 9:00:04 PM PST by Williams (It's the policies, stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

The main question especially in the realm of End Times, how will China play out in relation to Israel ? The same with North Korea. I know DPRK is going against Israel. Also ook at Venezuela as well with that sulfur smelling fat@$$.


35 posted on 12/28/2010 9:03:06 PM PST by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

We financed that new Chinese missile with 20 years of off-whoring our manufacturing to the Chinese.

I have said this before and I will say it again.....

If there is any justice in this world, I hope these Benedict Arnold manufacturing execs, that have been cashing fat bonus checks from their “efficiency improving” factories in China, will live long enough to see their grandchildren brought home with American flags draped over their caskets, after they are killed by the Chinese military that has been modernized from profits made at grandpa’s China factory. What goes around COMES AROUND!

And when you sow the wind you will reap the whirlwind.

Now I would like to post some more but I have to pop over to Wally World to buy a piece of crap or two made in China.


36 posted on 12/28/2010 9:05:48 PM PST by NeverForgetBataan (To the German Commander: ..........................NUTS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

We have those missiles too; would Taiwan, Korea and Japan like some?


37 posted on 12/28/2010 9:08:41 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Democrat Party is shovel ready)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Thanks goes out to Misters Clinton and Walton. One for giving away the guidance technology that makes this possible and the other for supplying the funds to pay for it.


38 posted on 12/28/2010 9:10:06 PM PST by redangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
They pop a carrier, we pop Three Gorges Dam.

Never happen. Two words: collateral damage. If a snail darter might get hurt, then we will destroy all our weapons in fear of that hypothetical.

We won't even shoot gun wielding terrorists for fear they might step behind a woman and she might get blood splatter.

We aren't even a paper tiger.

39 posted on 12/28/2010 9:10:31 PM PST by The Theophilus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Don’t we hear about China’s new “carrier-killer” missiles every couple years? I suppose I’m just remembering it as it goes through testing phases, but these latest articles give me a big deja vu.


40 posted on 12/28/2010 9:11:23 PM PST by andyk (Hi, my name's Andy, and I am a BF 1942 / Desert Combat junkie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson