It seems like the White House is trying to frame the argument that he was born in the US so he is eligible even though they have fully admitted his father was not a US citizen which would make him ineligible. So their final argument will have to be that Obama was not his real father?
That's what the Barry supporters are trying to allege. In other words, anchor baby's, who are currently "afforded" U.S. citizenship even though they (in the mothers womb) and their mother (at least) are in the country illegally, that such an anchor baby would be considered a "Natural Born Citizen" as known and intended by the framers...and thus POTUS eligible. It's 100% subversive B.S.
Assuming Sr. was in fact his legal father at birth, regardless of where he was born, Barry was born a subject to the crown of her majesty the Queen of England...by birthright, inherited from his foreign father. It's impossible, under those circumstances, that he is or ever was a Natural Born Citizen.
If Sr. isn't his legal father at birth (Sr. was married at the time he allegedly impregnated Barry's alleged mother), then Barry has some explaining to do re: why he took many oaths of office under the name "Obama" and why his campaign web site proudly displayed a forged government document.
What if his supposed father is not the real father?