Replies

These sh*t-talking competitions are no basis for asserting that Hispanic culture is gay-friendly

To back up your assertion

I made no such assertions.

Go back and reread my original reply. I asserted that the "catcher" was more disapproved of than the "pitcher"

You denied it, I proved it and you took a small portion of that proof way out of context and to top it off you still haven't backed up your absurd statement that "Catholic Bishops were homosexual and/or Free Masons".

Go back and reread my original reply. I asserted that the "catcher" was more disapproved of than the "pitcher"

That would be no different than any society, including our own. You said that provider/bugeron homosexuals were considered normal or acceptable in some Hispanic societies:

Graybeard58: "I understand that in some Hispanic societies that only the "catcher" is considered queer."

you still haven't backed up your absurd statement that "Catholic Bishops were homosexual and/or Free Masons".

First you falsely accuse me of misrepresenting you. Then you go on to misrepresent me by cutting off the qualifying words "many modern" from my statement. Apparently there is nothing you can dispute in my proof that many modern Catholic bishops are homosexual and/or Free Masons. Here is more proof from Bishop Fellay:

"we have big problems, and these problems mean that there's a fight in the church. You have different tendencies: you have the progressists, you have the conservative. And then also in Rome, you have certain other, other things, like "lobbies": Mafia, the Freemasons."

http://whispersintheloggia.blogspot.com/2006/03/rome-and-its-scarecrows.html