Posted on 12/30/2010 10:22:38 AM PST by SeekAndFind
She looks gorgeous. Beautiful inside and out.
No, I’m not. Leaders of nations and leaders of militaries should be men. Period. Label me a sexist but you’ll find that 90% of GOP women and probably a majority of Dems would agree.
WHO is the establishment and how do they get enough Republicans to vote for their candidates? I really want to know. Everyone keeps making these allegations but I don't understand the mechanics of how it works.
So you don’t think men should be leaders? And you don’t think Sarah is hot?
This:
"I really like Sarah Palin BUT...[insert liberal talking point or snark here].
I would disagree that their is no one more qualified “for” the White House. Now, if you change that to “in” the white house, I could heartily agree.
I think Senator DeMint and US Represenative Michele Bachman are both trustworthy, but both have said they're not interested and I take them at their word. I would love to see a Palin/Bachmann ticket, but that's likely one woman too many for the electorate.
Sarah Palin is an American conservative in the classic mold, a populist in her natural style, but extremely bright, thoughtful, and increasingly sophisticated.
She has *charisma* like no other, save for Ronald Reagan.
she is:
ineluctable:
adjective: inevitable, unavoidable, inescapable, shunless, necessary, indivertible
1.Unable to be resisted or avoided; inescapable,
the ineluctable facts of history
GOLDA MIER, MARGARET THATCHER....
You comments are sexist.
So you don’t think men should be leaders? And you don’t think Sarah is hot?
Young man, grow up, and please heed my previous advice: stop digging before you bury yourself.
Men *are* leaders...(duh). Our Republic has not yet elected a female president/CIC, but Sarah Palin is most certainly qualified.
Sarah Palin is beautiful, but her beauty is more than skin deep. She has a beautiful heart and soul. She is a patriot. She's the happily married, mother of five, grandmother of one. She is not a Playboy Bunny. Grow up.
no flames from me.
I can understand your point of view but I’d like to let you in on a little secret.
Sarah has been running since August of 2009. 2010 was the year to reintroduce herself to America.
You don’t sound like you have watched her Alaska show (I could be wrong) but I bet every single candidate would love an eight hour ‘introduction’ of their life and family to America that this show provides.
I have spoken with many people who had previous negative impressions about her suddenly tell me the show has changed their opinion of her. It is a huge positive. (except for the PETA bed-wetters and tree huggers)
She has been putting out very serious policy positions along the way as well, although the mainstream (lamestream?) media doesn’t cover that, naturally.
2011 will be the year she steps up her policy speeches and op-eds, along with travel abroad meeting with world leaders. I wouldn’t be surprised to see another book next fall, on specific things she would run on and do once elected.
Just watch, she has been working a brilliant PR strategy to perfection. 2010 was all about name recognition and staying front and center in the public square...she has succeeded masterfully. (70% of her backed candidates won in 2010)
Next year’s focus will be serious policy and the direction she would take the country, and when she starts campaigning she will walk away with the nomination and win the White House in a landslide.
Yes, inside and out. Beautiful heart and soul.
Sarah has more balls and guts and fight in her than 99% of the so called “men” in the GOP.
I trust her 99% over the Boehner/McConnel/Graham cabal.
Oops. You should have told that to Golda Meir and Margaret Thatcher.
Now is NOT the time to go wobbly!
And I wonder how that Yum Kipper war went?
You are beyond pathetic.
You are amazing. I don’t know how you do it.
"Pancreatic failures"?
She displays a far more realistic perspective on the Middle East and has far more accurately taken the measure of America’s geopolitical competitors, particularly Russia and China, than anyone in the Democratic administration.
He's saying that he agrees with what he thinks she thinks about the Middle East, Russian, and China.
Whether she's really deeply analyzed those regions and clearly sees what's going on there is a whole 'nother matter.
Frankly, I don’t know how it works either, but I’m nearly 70 years old and have seen it happen over and over. My guess is that a bunch of old Republican men get together and dig up dirt and force anyone that is a real conservative out of the picture.
Yes it was, thank you!
She has mine as well, and the vote of everyone I know well enough to discuss current-day politics with... and I live in Massachusetts! What a long, strange trip this is...
8^D
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.