Incidentally, if you support violent no-knock raids for non-violent circumstances like suspected drug possession it means that to you, it’s worth killing people to preserve evidence that might put someone behind bars. I suggest that placing a conviction at higher value than preserving human lives is reversed, un-Christian, and supportive of tyranny. (Read your own tagline.)
This would be true even if no-knocks were never at wrong addresses, and never killed innocent people. But they do both of those things too.
100% agree with you. Reading about innocent people like that lady in Atlanta killed in no-knock raids by incompetent cops really pisses me off. And why do they shoot people’s dogs so often?
>Incidentally, if you support violent no-knock raids for non-violent circumstances like suspected drug possession it means that to you, it’s worth killing people to preserve evidence that might put someone behind bars. I suggest that placing a conviction at higher value than preserving human lives is reversed, un-Christian, and supportive of tyranny. (Read your own tagline.)<
I do support no knock raids - it is not unchristian (or are you now god that makes these decisions?) I am not advocating killing people. These things are done to arrest people not execute them. Why don’t you just give it up - it is about arresting someone who has broken a law. But apparently you think that letting gang bangers walk around selling drugs to kids is alright.
meanwhile you demonize me for supporting a no knock on a guy who carries weapons to defend his “white powder” so he can sell it to kids, get them hooked, OD, and you support shooting cops.