Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

For reference:

Hollister v Soetoro - DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 14, 2011 (SCOTUS)

And http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2648964/posts?page=198#198

1 posted on 01/01/2011 2:12:56 PM PST by rxsid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LucyT; Fred Nerks; null and void; stockpirate; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; ...
Ping to the WND article (referenced yesterday):

"New eligibility challenge reaches Supreme Court (re: Hollister v Soetoro)

2 posted on 01/01/2011 2:14:41 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid

Sotomayor and Kagan should be informed that they are to go home and stay there until the outcome of the Supreme Hearing Process is achieved. Lets say the Supreme Court decides to hear the case and it is ruled Obummer is unconstitutional and to be removed so too will be Sotomayor and Kagan. All the rulings that they were part of will be recalled for another hearing. I am not an attorney but it seems if their appointments were confered by an illegal would not their appointments and rulings be to considered illegal.


3 posted on 01/01/2011 2:42:20 PM PST by hondact200 (Candor dat viribos alas (sincerity gives wings to strength) and Nil desperandum (never despair))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid
"Unthinkable" is the first stage of public reaction in the Overton Window. The concept that Obama is ineligible for the presidency seems to be edging towards the "acceptable" and "sensible" stages.
5 posted on 01/01/2011 2:56:08 PM PST by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid

Something must be up, though I’m sure it’s a longshot. Why else would Gov Abercrombie in HI resurface this issue?

Keep in mind that the Democrats believe this is a winning issue for them, not unlike Whitewater was for Clinton. The media makes the sheeple believe that this is the fantasy of those evil, mean-spirited Republicans. So they may be deliberately resurfacing the issue.

Lastly, my crystal ball tells me that in one of these cases, SCOTUS is going to find merit, but frame the decision so it won’t hurt Obama or the office of the Presidency. Not unlike when the WFL sued the NFL and won the princely sum of $1, then promptly folded.


6 posted on 01/01/2011 3:00:22 PM PST by Eccl 10:2 (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem - Ps 122:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: txnuke

ping

txnuke’s post:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2650094/posts

Most-likely scenario? (Re-emergence of the “birth certificate” issue explained)


8 posted on 01/01/2011 3:05:22 PM PST by txhurl (This Is Not America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid

What I fail to understand is that given the very real possibility that Obama IS an illegal president, WHY haven’t the states taken action to put a law into effect that prevents an ineligible candidate from getting on the ballot? To date, isn’t Arizona the ONLY state that has done so?


14 posted on 01/01/2011 3:48:34 PM PST by teletech (Say NO to RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/12/27/visitor-to-lt-col-lakin-turned-away/


24 posted on 01/01/2011 5:26:48 PM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid

can you make a new thread on this..pls..I will probably screw it up.

STAND UP FOR THE CONSTITUTION

STAND DOWN FROM ALL UNLAWFUL ORDERS

Make this your Number One resolution of the New Year on:

LTC LAKIN DAY – January 1, 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oUM8BbQQhk&feature=player_embedded


26 posted on 01/01/2011 5:38:29 PM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid

The only reason the Tea Party has been so successful in taking over the House, getting function control of the Senate, and setting the political agenda for the country is because it managed to marginalize and eclipse the Birthers, freaks, and Joseph Farah-type hucksters who make a living off idiotic conspiracy theories.

If the Birthers did not exist, James Carvile and Rahm Emmanuel would invent them, because to the extent that they have any influence, all they manage to do is make the Right look like idiots.

Question to ponder: What’s the media outlet that publicizes the Birthers the most? Answer: MSNBC. It shouldn’t be that difficult to figure out why.


31 posted on 01/01/2011 6:28:52 PM PST by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid
And if the Supreme Court says he is CONSTITUTIONALLY the president?

What then?

43 posted on 01/02/2011 1:29:19 PM PST by walsh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rxsid

Cert. was denied, per the Supreme Court’s order list published today. No dissents, no comments.


47 posted on 01/18/2011 11:02:09 AM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson