Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: camle

camle wrote: “yeah! let’s take out our frustration on a bunch of elderly, retired pensioneers. that ought to give us real good PR.”

Great idea. Let’s continue to ignore the problem; it has worked so far. After all, how bad could it get?


9 posted on 01/06/2011 4:53:11 AM PST by Senator John Blutarski (The progress of government: republic, democracy, technocracy, bureaucracy, plutocracy, kleptocracy,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Senator John Blutarski
We cannot ignore the problem. What needs to be done is put tighter rules on the local governmental units to property fund the pensions. We need to look away from defined benefit to a defined contribution system. My last employer did just that. All new hires were in the contribution program.
Fair or unfair, these contracts were negotiated. We cannot simply cut off retirees. Economic considerations were made to either obtain or retain the pensions.Changes need to be made going forward otherwise costs could be applied by the retirees.

There is games in some areas where the pension is tax deductible due to disability. The example of the marathon running firefighter. This is corruption. Deal with these issues and don't paint the whole retiree group in the same vein.

Deal with the problems, define solutions, don't just ‘bomb’ throw.

12 posted on 01/06/2011 5:14:02 AM PST by midcop402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson