Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: phil_will1

If I’m not mistaken, a tax on consumption would pass Constitutional muster, whereas a tax on “income” does not.

Is this correct?


74 posted on 01/07/2011 5:00:49 AM PST by Westbrook (Having children does not divide your love, it multiplies it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Westbrook

“If I’m not mistaken, a tax on consumption would pass Constitutional muster, whereas a tax on ‘income’ does not.”

The founders rejected the notion of an income tax, which is why the 16th amendment had to be ratified. An income tax had been tried a couple of times in the 19th century (most notably to help finance the Civil War), but the Supreme Court struck down an income tax sometime after that. The 16th amendment was ratified in 1913, I think.

We believe that the founders got it right and the legislatures (both state and federal) of the early 20th century were wrong. I won’t even get into the controversy over whether the 16th was duly ratified or not.


76 posted on 01/07/2011 5:14:16 AM PST by phil_will1 (My posts are in no way limited or restricted by previously expressed SQL opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson