Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans introduce bill to eliminate presidential 'czars'
The Hill ^

Posted on 01/06/2011 1:56:14 PM PST by Sub-Driver

Republicans introduce bill to eliminate presidential 'czars' By Michael O'Brien - 01/06/11 04:15 PM ET

A group of House Republicans introduced a bill on Wednesday to rein in the various "czars" in the Obama administration.

Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) and 28 other House Republicans introduced legislation to do away with the informal, paid advisers President Obama has employed over the past two years.

The legislation, which was introduced in the last Congress but was not allowed to advance under Democratic control, would do away with the 39 czars Obama has employed during his administration.

The bill defines a czar as "a head of any task force, council, policy office within the Executive Office of the President, or similar office established by or at the direction of the President" who is appointed to a position that would otherwise require Senate confirmation.

Republicans had complained about the president's use of czars to help advance his agenda in Congress. In particular, the GOP had harped about the personal history of Van Jones, the president's czar for "green jobs," over past comments Jones had made about Fox News came to light. Jones eventually resigned.

Another prominent czar over the past year was Carol Browner, the president's energy and environmental adviser. She helped head up efforts in response to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, and the ultimately unsuccessful effort for an energy and climate bill from Congress.

Republicans introduced several bills to eliminate czars in the last Congress, but similar legislation could conceivably advance in the House now that the GOP controls the chamber.

"We haven’t gotten an indication of an exact timeline for committee action, considering that the bill was just filed yesterday," said Scalise spokesman Stephen Bell. "We hope to have this discussion in the near future as the congressman works to pursue all the bills he has introduced in the 112th Congress."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 112th; bho44; bhoczars; commitment; congress; czars; democrats; integrity; keepurword; marxistcoup; obama; rattner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 next last
To: Sub-Driver

Good, first the Czars, then the agency’s that are enacting laws that have no right to.


121 posted on 01/06/2011 7:12:34 PM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Right on. These unelected, unconfirmed cabinet members are a travesty. I didn’t support it when Bush had czars, either.


122 posted on 01/06/2011 7:43:44 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: browniexyz

And MANY, MANY of them perform redundant functions. Rush was talking about 8 federal departments had a total of 59 agencies which all did basically the same thing. Seems to me that it is ripe for doing away with 58 programs and the vast majority of people who work there.


123 posted on 01/06/2011 7:49:01 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Amen


124 posted on 01/06/2011 7:53:34 PM PST by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

No kings in american

No dukes or princes either


125 posted on 01/06/2011 7:58:26 PM PST by Chickensoup (Protecting US interests ONLY if US interests move back into the States and give US citizens jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

OMG I love this, God bless our Republicans.


126 posted on 01/06/2011 9:08:09 PM PST by Katarina (God bless ElRushbo and Mark Levin! Prayers for our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tutstar

Didn’t Nixon start the Czars with Elvis?


127 posted on 01/06/2011 9:28:39 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hondact200
if they refuse to leave quietly arrest the SOBs and put their butts in a federal prison

Ha Ha - Eric Holder, they AG who would not even prosecute voter intimidation?

DEFUND THEM, Harry Reid would have no choice - go ahead and refuse to vote on it - the end result is the same - no money to pay them or operate their bloated staffs. I am so hoping the new GOP is up to this fights that are on the horizon.
128 posted on 01/06/2011 9:42:13 PM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
"How are these czars paid? Obama's stash."
Tax payers.
129 posted on 01/06/2011 9:43:06 PM PST by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NFHale
Introduce a bill outlawing communism and socialism

Unfortunately, now that they've made such a big deal about the Constitution, they are going to have to follow it.

130 posted on 01/06/2011 10:32:07 PM PST by drubyfive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I haven’t followed the ‘czar’ hoopla.

They are just assistant secretaries of various cabinet-level agencies, right? Has the executive branch somehow done and end-run around the confirmation process? What new power has been grabbed that the executive branch didn’t already have, is what I’m trying to understand.


131 posted on 01/06/2011 10:34:13 PM PST by vmpolesov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Well, let’s be fair here. Sure, in many cases the employees don’t do much, or anything. But the redundant agencies do provide a lot of middle-class employment to many residents of Virginia, Maryland, and the District of Columbia!


132 posted on 01/06/2011 10:36:45 PM PST by vmpolesov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver; Arthur Wildfire! March; betty boop; greyfoxx39; Politicalmom

YYYYYEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


133 posted on 01/06/2011 11:34:52 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Well, it’s nice to read that they are spending their time productively.


134 posted on 01/07/2011 4:30:11 AM PST by Miss_Meyet (I post, therefore I am---avoiding something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss_Meyet

Perfect place to start in eliminating non-essential parts of this overly bloated monstrous government. We have a president, Congressmen, and our Supreme Court. That’s all we need to provide representation to the PEOPLE.

Czars always seemed as if they were mouthpieces of the President. The President should lead ALONE. If he has a special interest of his own, he needs to persuade and influence others on his own merit — not through special czars and other appointees.


135 posted on 01/07/2011 5:27:05 AM PST by LibsRJerks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: surroundedbyblue

The funniest part is to see your friends list drop after you post it.


136 posted on 01/07/2011 5:34:22 AM PST by DarkSavant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

YES!


137 posted on 01/07/2011 5:49:52 AM PST by left that other site
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

I think we need to re-institute the House Committee on Un-American Activities and smoke out every last Marxist and Communist in the government.


138 posted on 01/07/2011 5:58:21 AM PST by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

According to the US CHamber of Commerce, Obamacare creates 183 NEW federal agencies; the Nat’l Center for Policy Analysis estimates that at 159. Either way, more than one too many!!! Defunding the bills won’t be enough; Congress is going to have to destroy the existence of entire departments of employees.


139 posted on 01/07/2011 6:19:44 AM PST by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: LibsRJerks
....We have a president, Congressmen, and our Supreme Court. That’s all we need to provide representation to the PEOPLE....

Well, it certainly worked well enough for the first 200 or so years. I will now refrain from mentioning what administration first introduced the odious concept of the "American czar."

140 posted on 01/07/2011 7:37:07 AM PST by Miss_Meyet (I post, therefore I am---avoiding something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-150 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson