[Lurking Libertarian]

I don’t remember the particulars with regard to why the $20k fine first came down.

It was not for filing the suit challenging Obama's eligibility. it was for filing a motion to reconsider the dismissal of the case, in which she accused the judge of "treason" and claimed that the judge had secretly met with Attorney General Holder in the courthouse in Georgia (on a day when Holder was actually making public appearances in Los Angeles).

[DoughtyOne]

Thanks. I appreciate the clarification. I remembered that she had done some things that made me think she was a kook, but couldn’t remember the particulars.

You may think the judge is treasonous (and hell, they may be), but it’s not going to get your case reconsidered on the merits, to tell him/her they are. Telling them they are will only destroy your own credibility. And sadly, Taitz did that here.

Then making false charges on top of it? Dumb dumb dumb...

Chalk one up for Obama due to her actions alone.

Those who disagree with me on that point, please think how much better it would have been if she were appealing the dismissal of the judge on it’s merits, rather than the $20k fine on it’s merits.