But your hyperbole refuses to acknowledge the point. If Obama did authorize his campaign to get that COLB from Hawaii, he knows it's legitimate. He knows the information Hawaii has is legitimate. He put it on a website simply as a courtesy, since he's not obliged to prove anything to you.
Now, if that is true, why would he consider you anything but either a nut or someone who's so emotionally invested in his not being legitimate that you'd imagine something wrong with any information he provided? Why, then, would he waste any time on you?
Obama doesn't because he can't!
It really is **that** simple!
Since Obama's alleged COLB wasn't issued until June 2007, then you're saying Obama never used this COLB to get a drivers license or passport. So what birth record did he use??
If Obama did authorize his campaign to get that COLB from Hawaii, he knows it's legitimate. He knows the information Hawaii has is legitimate. He put it on a website simply as a courtesy, since he's not obliged to prove anything to you.
Right, he was so confident that he had factlack dot org come take photographs of it three months before he released it to the public and then had his lawyer point to a factlack article instead of presenting the so-called 'legitimate' COLB to a court of law where it would be self-authenticating evidence. Now that's confidence.
The assumption that Hawai DoH issued a valid COLB to Obama is a mighty big one. The DoH refuses to answer the direct question whether they issued a copy of birth certificate to Obama on June 6, 2007!
In addition, birth registration INDEX data, which is by Hawaii law PUBLIC, is hidden from US citizens/voters. Request for Obama’s birth index data, which included the registration number 10641, was ignored by the DoH.
There is no logical explanation for their refusal to answer trivial questions about PUBLIC data.