Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hojczyk

So what.

You heard me. So what. You can’t arrest somebody unless you have a real threat. Just because somebody is odd or a misfit or weird........you have to wait until they do something hello.

Judas Priest, these journalists are idiots, total nincompoops.


3 posted on 01/10/2011 3:41:11 PM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: yldstrk

Why is nobody talking about what police protection they had at this meeting? Fact is, there was none. Who’s responsability was that?


4 posted on 01/10/2011 3:47:34 PM PST by AGreatPer (Voting for the crazy conservative gave us Ronald Reagan....Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk

Your wrong, Communicating a threat is a felony. If this is true it will come out in court.


5 posted on 01/10/2011 3:48:40 PM PST by JoSixChip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk

I believe making a death threat is considered a form of assault. Any Attorneys want to weigh in on that one?


8 posted on 01/10/2011 3:51:51 PM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk
If he's making death threats by phone, that's under the category of terroristic threats, or perhaps stalking. I don't know Arizona law, but Georgia law provides for both offenses and Arizona law probably isn't very different. I'm sure somebody'll correct me if I'm wrong.

OCGA 16-11-37(a): "A person commits the offense of a terroristic threat when he or she threatens to commit any crime of violence . . . " OCGA 16-5-90: "A person commits the offense of stalking when he or she follows, places under surveillance, or contacts another person at or about a place or places without the consent of the other person for the purpose of harassing and intimidating the other person. . . "

Either one is prosecutable here. Stalking does not require an actual death threat, only putting somebody in reasonable fear of bodily harm. Looks like we've got that here - this guy was obviously deranged and plenty of people have reported that they thought he was violent. Terroristic threats requires corroboration, but if he was making multiple death threats to various people at the school and elsewhere, just about any magistrate would issue a warrant because the threats corroborate each other.

If all these people called the sheriff's office and the sheriff's office declined to pursue a warrant, the sheriff may have a problem here. But it all depends on "what he knew and when he knew it."

10 posted on 01/10/2011 3:55:35 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (Ministrix of ye Chasse, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: yldstrk

Maybe it matters because the Sherriff could have prevented him from passing a background check to get a gun. Did the Sherriff take the necessary steps to prevent him from purchasing weapons? Could he have? Should he have? Smart reporters would be finding out.


13 posted on 01/10/2011 4:03:52 PM PST by carmody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson