To: Stand Watch Listen
Every report i have seen about the Chines ASBM say that it uses a nuke. If so using them would open up a can of worms that I don't think China would want to. What is the sense of taking Taiwan if you end up reducing the whole world to a radioactive cinder.
And there is no such thing as a limited nuclear war. If the Chinese nuked a CV battle group and killed tens of thousands of US sailors there would be a immediate call to hit back in kind. And even Obama couldn't hold that back. One nuke into the Three Gorges Dam and you would kill almost as many Chinese as there are Americans.
8 posted on
01/11/2011 7:54:25 AM PST by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: GonzoGOP
If there is a traitor in chief, Russia or China can launch a first strike nuclear attack, and we won’t reply in kind. Clintons PDD that the US would not give launch codes if an attack was spotted incoming. We would first absorb a nuclear strike. This would give the advantage to our attackers, as many of our missiles would be destroyed. We have now signed on to another treaty with the true “Evil Empire” virtually guaranteeing a 3rd World War. Anyone that knows history, can see that before the war, the enemy moves to constrain the West with new “peace treaties” once they have moved to a point where they have superior position, they will strike. China and Russia want us dead, any other reading of their intent is wrong.
23 posted on
01/11/2011 8:38:07 AM PST by
runninglips
(Don't support the Republican party, work to "fundamentally change" it...conservative would be nice)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson