[KosmicKitty]

FWIW, I have heard a very convincing argument from a forensic expert that OJ wasn’t the killer, but his son, Jason, was & the old man was just trying to take the heat for the kid.

[IYAS9YAS]

FWIW, I have heard a very convincing argument from a forensic expert that OJ wasn’t the killer, but his son, Jason, was & the old man was just trying to take the heat for the kid.

I had a co-worker mention the same thing years back. Something about the DNA evidence and how it was tested.

[antceecee]

I remember hearing the same and thinking it could be true.

[skr]

All of the evidence points to OJ. Perhaps his son helped, but not having an alibi is not the most convincing evidence when there are so many pieces of evidence that point to OJ.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/nns25.htm lists the evidence and both views of it.

[Netizen]

FWIW, I have heard a very convincing argument from a forensic expert that OJ wasn’t the killer, but his son, Jason, was & the old man was just trying to take the heat for the kid.

That's what I've thought all along!

[beezdotcom]

FWIW, I have heard a very convincing argument from a forensic expert that OJ wasn’t the killer, but his son, Jason, was & the old man was just trying to take the heat for the kid.

Yes, it's from the book/documentary OJ Is Guilty, But Not Of Murder by William Dear. I find it fairly compelling. Among the points:

Jason was emotionally disturbed and prone to violent outbursts - and had gone off his meds
Jason was upset at Ron and Nicole, one reason was because they failed to deliver on a promise to eat at the restaurant where he was cooking that night
Jason was known to carry a knife
His DNA would have also pointed to OJ, unless very specific tests were done to separate the two
...and a number of other interesting points that provide an equally valid interpretation of the evidence presented against OJ.

[stansblugrassgrl]

Remember the slow speed chase? When Simpson pulled into his driveway, the son came running up to the vehicle and Simpson pushed him away. From that moment on, I felt like the son was the real murder. No proof, just a thought.

[Ol' Sparky]

FWIW, I have heard a very convincing argument from a forensic expert that OJ wasn’t the killer, but his son, Jason, was

Then, why was OJ's blood and size 12 Bruno Magli shoe prints (of which OJ owned a pair) found at the scene?

[WhyisaTexasgirlinPA]

I find that hard to believe since to this day OJ claims “someone else” did it - if he had been trying to protect his son, he wouldn’t have been trying to get the police to look for someone other than himself.