Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Natufian

It is blood libel.


13 posted on 01/12/2011 5:54:50 AM PST by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: jimbo123

“It is blood libel.”

Indeed, it is. It’s an attack not only on Palin, Rush et. al, but on everything who listens to them or thinks like them.

In other words, it’s a full frontal attack on all of US.


19 posted on 01/12/2011 5:56:51 AM PST by Pravious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: jimbo123
It is blood libel.

It couldn't be more apt.

It is the use of a false accusation of murder to incite persecution against the accused.

Knowing the history as well as I do, the term popped into my head immediately upon hearing the allusions to Sarah Palin.

That Mrs. Palin, an Alaskan self-described "hockey mom", could pull out this apt analogy from the depths of a generally forgotten history, shows remarkable depth. If someone else provided her the words, she's made a good choice in using them.

I still don't think she's qualified to be President.
300 posted on 01/12/2011 8:57:01 AM PST by kenavi (The good ol' US of A: 57 state laboratories for the future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson